The release of ChatGPT in November 2022 transformed second language (L2) writing instruction and led to rapid growth in research on large language model (LLM)-generated feedback; however, no synthesis has mapped this literature in terms of feedback quality, learner uptake, and pedagogical integration. This scoping review examines 185 empirical studies published between November 2022 and March 2026 that were identified through a Scopus search (n = 283 screened) and analysed using a systematic keyword-based charting framework applied to full abstracts, with full-text analysis of 35 studies. The review identifies four major patterns: (1) comparative AI–human feedback research dominates the literature (27.6%); (2) content-level feedback remains underexplored (13.5% of studies); (3) learner uptake is rarely measured as a primary outcome; and (4) LLM feedback is broadly comparable to teacher feedback for surface-level errors but weaker for content and argumentation, while learner perceptions often exceed demonstrated performance outcomes. Hybrid AI–teacher models show promising but underexamined potential, accounting for only 12.4% of the literature. The field shows a focus on perceptions rather than learning outcomes, an apparent tendency toward positive-results reporting, and no clear teaching models. This study proposes a typology of LLM feedback functions and outlines a research agenda focused on uptake, longitudinal outcomes, and hybrid AI–teacher integration.
Written corrective feedback (WCF) is a cornerstone of second language (L2) writing instruction, and the emergence of AI-based tools has substantially transformed its delivery. However, a critical conceptual distinction exists between AI tools that provide corrective feedback on linguistic form, such as Grammarly and Ca...
Luiza Marabyan, Lilit Avetisyan, Marine Avetisyan et al.· Technology in Language Teach...· 1 citation
Oral corrective feedback (OCF) has long been recognized as a central component of second language acquisition (SLA), with its scholarly landscape growing increasingly diverse. Nevertheless, existing reviews are either relatively dated, unable to account for recent advances including the rapid emergence of AI‑mediated f...
Yi-Ming Zeng· International Educational Re...· 0 citations
We investigate whether state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) generate feedback that reflects the pedagogical practices of expert teachers in terms of feedback focus and adaptivity. Previous evaluation efforts have examined feedback characteristics, its impact on learning, and its target, yet the focus of feedba...
A hybrid model of feedback provision is put forward in which language instructors can leverage GenAI to support formative assessment while maintaining pedagogical oversight, and the findings offer guidance for integrating GenAI into academic writing instruction in ways that preserve instructional quality and student ag...
A systematic review of empirical studies published from 2023 to 2026 demonstrates that generative AI facilitates writing quality improvement, revision processes, learner autonomy and increased writing access by providing on-time, tailored and interactive support.
Muhammad Imran, Z. Ali, Mohammad Musab Bin Azmat Ali· International journal of com...· 0 citations
Research on feedback in English language education has grown rapidly. Nevertheless, its findings remain scattered across studies that each address a single aspect, such as corrective feedback types, peer feedback, or Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated commentary, in isolation. Teachers and researchers seeking an in...
J. Patty, Felicia Miranda Lekatompessy· Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin d...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.