Optimized Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Clinical Outcomes

Abstract

Background The expansion of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to younger patients with longer life expectancy requires procedural optimization to enhance long-term valve durability. Objectives To evaluate the relationship between fluoroscopic determinants of optimal transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation—coaxiality, implantation depth, and expansion—and clinical and valve-related outcomes. Methods In this cohort study, consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR with balloon-expandable prostheses (Sapien S3, Sapien S3 Ultra) between February 2014 and June 2022 were included. THV coaxiality, implantation depth, and expansion were assessed in the 3-cusp view following deployment using standardized protocols. Suboptimal implantation was defined as ≥1 unfavorable determinants (coaxiality ≥4.8°, depth ≥6 mm, or underexpansion ≥20%). Outcomes included the modified early safety endpoint, moderate or severe hemodynamic valve deterioration, and stage 2 bioprosthetic valve failure. Results Among 1,032 patients (mean age 81 ± 6 years, 35.1% female), suboptimal THV implantation occurred in 443 (42.9%) patients and was driven by noncoaxial deployment (n = 240, 23.3%), excessive implantation depth (n = 261, 25.3%), and underexpansion (n = 54, 5.2%). Suboptimal implantation was associated with a higher likelihood of the modified early safety endpoint at 30 days (43.3% vs 19.9%; adjusted odds ratio: 3.05; 95% CI: 2.30-4.04) and stage 2 bioprosthetic valve failure at 5 years (subHR: 4.40; 95% CI: 1.25-13.59). Patients with ≥2 determinants demonstrated higher rates of hemodynamic valve deterioration at 5 years (subHR: 3.48; 95% CI: 1.24-9.80). Conclusions Optimal THV implantation was associated with improved early procedural safety and long-term THV durability in balloon-expandable TAVR. Systematic fluoroscopic assessment of optimized valve implantation may enhance patient outcomes.