A five-dimensional analytical framework is introduced that clarifies how EI transforms isolated search trajectories into cumulative scientific insight, and identifies critical bottlenecks regarding evaluation, process traceability, and shared infrastructure.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is shifting scientific discovery from task-specific workflows towards autonomous systems that organize exploration with experimental and human feedback in open-ended candidate spaces. Evolutionary computation (EC) provides a computational basis for feedback-driven discovery because population-based search can maintain diverse scientific candidates while steering exploration through accumulated evidence. However, EC predominantly focuses on candidate refinement for predefined problems, whereas cumulative discovery requires experience retention. To bridge this gap, this review introduces evolutionary intelligence (EI) for scientific discovery. EI characterizes scientific AI systems that sustain exploration by linking candidate refinement with experience retention across evolutionary cycles. We introduce a five-dimensional analytical framework that asks what evolves, how candidates change, why candidates are selected, where feedback originates, and when evolution occurs. This framework clarifies how EI transforms isolated search trajectories into cumulative scientific insight. We further demonstrate this paradigm across diverse discovery modes, from evolving concrete scientific entities to orchestrating automated research workflows. Finally, we identify critical bottlenecks regarding evaluation, process traceability, and shared infrastructure, providing a concrete roadmap for advancing the transition from EC to EI in scientific discovery.
Bridging Literature, Agents, and Zero-gap Experimentation (BLAZE), a paradigm of socialized scientific intelligence, makes discovery more traceable, reproducible, and cumulative while preserving human creativity, judgment, and responsibility.
Xinjie Yao, Xingxin Xu, Xiyuan Gao et al.· 0 citations
This article examines the emerging paradigm of agentic AI for scientific discovery, traces the conceptual shift from tools to agents, lays out a six-stage workflow spanning literature synthesis to manuscript generation, and reviews practical systems in chemistry, equation discovery, materials science, and general machine learning research.
Alexander Taktakidze· Longevity Horizon· 0 citations
Recent advances in foundation models have transformed AI for Science, enabling remarkably accurate predictive performance across domains ranging from protein folding to weather forecasting. Yet prediction alone does not constitute scientific discovery. Scientific understanding depends on uncovering the reusable explanatory mechanisms that generate observations, whereas contemporary machine learning remains fundamentally organised around predictive mappings rather than explanatory structure. In this paper, we argue that scientific discovery is fundamentally a problem of knowledge organisation. To this end, we introduce Mechanistic World Models, a new design paradigm that places reusable mechanisms at the centre of representation, computation and learning. Drawing on insights from the philosophy of science, we derive the computational capabilities required for discovery, identify the design principles and inductive pressures that encourage explanatory knowledge to emerge, and formalise the anatomy of a mechanism-centric world model. Finally, we show how diverse research directions including mechanistic interpretability, causal representation learning, equation discovery and modular architectures capture complementary ingredients of this paradigm while lacking a unified framework. We propose Mechanistic World Models as a conceptual foundation and computational blueprint for moving AI beyond predictive forecasting towards autonomous scientific discovery.
Results on diverse long-horizon benchmarks demonstrate the efficacy of ScienceFlow's ability to sustain effective research processes, and demonstrates that efficient state management, adaptive exploration, and objective-aligned execution are critical for scaling autonomous research beyond short-horizon interactions.
Mingming Zhao, Jiqian Dong, Kangping Xu et al.· 0 citations
Automation is transforming scientific discovery by enabling systematic exploration of complex hypotheses. Large language models (LLMs) perform well across diverse tasks and promise to accelerate research, but often struggle with logical structures. Here, we present a framework for biological discovery integrating LLM-based agents with laboratory automation, guided by logical scaffolds incorporating symbolic relational learning, structured vocabularies and experimental constraints. This integration improves coherence and reliability in automated workflows. We couple this AI-driven approach to automated cell-culture and metabolomics platforms, enabling integrated hypothesis validation and refinement, yielding a flexible discovery system. The system identified novel interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, including glutamate-induced growth inhibition in spermine-treated cells and aminoadipate's partial rescue of formic-acid stress. All hypotheses, experiments and data are captured in a graph database employing controlled vocabularies. Existing ontologies are extended, and a novel representation of scientific hypotheses is presented using description logics. This work demonstrates the potential for a reliable machine-driven discovery process in systems biology.
Daniel Brunnsåker, Alexander H. Gower, Prajakta Naval et al.· Journal of the Royal Society...· 2 citations
Inspired by search and recommender systems, this work builds Find, Attempt, and Recommend (FAR), a literature-to-review cascade that automates the search for suitable problems and focuses human attention on artifacts that have passed several stages of filtering.
Zeyu Zheng, Shengtong Zhang, Jeremy Avigad et al.· 0 citations