Skip to content
Open access

Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Informed Basal Insulin Optimization System in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Initial Evaluation of Efficacy, Safety, and Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes

Aug 2026 · Diabetes Therapy · Vol 17, pp. 1477 - 1494 · 0 citations · 27 references
Medicine

TL;DR

CGM-informed basal insulin optimization with a prototype of Dexcom Smart Basal was associated with improvements in glycemic control and treatment satisfaction in adults with T2D, with a favorable safety profile, and the system may help overcome clinical inertia and support individualized insulin titration in real-world settings.

Abstract

Clinical inertia and the complexity of basal insulin titration are major barriers to optimal glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). A prototype of the Dexcom Smart Basal system known as basal therapy optimization (BTO), a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-informed basal insulin optimization system, was evaluated for its efficacy, safety, and impact on patient-reported outcomes (PRO). In this prospective, single-arm study, 14 adults with T2D (three initiating and 11 optimizing basal insulin) used the BTO system. The study consisted of three phases: a ten-day baseline, up to 35 days of active titration, and a 20-day post-titration follow-up. Outcomes included change in CGM-derived glycemic metrics (mean glucose, time in range [TIR], time above range [TAR], time below range [TBR]), fasting blood glucose (FBG), and PROs (diabetes treatment satisfaction, glucose monitoring satisfaction, and patient–doctor depth of relationship) assessed using validated questionnaires. Safety was also assessed by the number of adverse events. All participants completed the study. The BTO system generated 401 insulin dose recommendations, with 96.5% accepted by the healthcare provider. After BTO-guided titration, mean glucose decreased by median (IQR) 26.3 (– 64.6, – 6.0) mg/dl (p = 0.0031), TIR 70–180 mg/dl increased by 16.0 (2.5, 43.7) percentage points (p = 0.0017), TAR > 180 mg/dl decreased by 15.9 (– 43.7, – 2.5) percentage points (p = 0.0017), and TBR < 70 mg/dl remained low (0.0–0.1%), with no clinically significant change in TBR. Median FBG decreased by 17.8 (– 54.4, 2.3) mg/dl (p = 0.052). No BTO- or study-related- adverse or severe adverse events were reported. Treatment satisfaction was significantly higher; median post-titration Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) Change score was 17 (14, 18) on a scale ranging from – 18 to 18 and was significantly different from baseline DTSQ status score (p = 0.001). High satisfaction with glucose management and strong patient–provider relationships were preserved. Three illustrative cases highlighted successful insulin dose optimization through dose increases or decreases. CGM-informed basal insulin optimization with a prototype of Dexcom Smart Basal was associated with improvements in glycemic control and treatment satisfaction in adults with T2D, with a favorable safety profile. The system may help overcome clinical inertia and support individualized insulin titration in real-world settings. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT07681375 (Submitted for retrospective registration on 1/28/2026 and registered on 7/1/2026).

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Evaluation of continuous glucose monitoring outcomes and health care resource utilization in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND Although continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is well established for insulin-treated diabetes, its utility in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains less studied. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the short-term clinical and economic outcomes following personal use of CGM in patients with T2D. METHODS Thi...

S. Gadd, Connor W. Willis, Ishfaq Rashid et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Technology choice, glycemic control and patient-reported outcome measures in adults with type 1 diabetes: A randomized crossover trial comparing a smart insulin pen with an automated insulin delivery system (EBIACE-1).

AID provides superior glycemic control, although nearly half of participants achieved near-optimal control with SIP, supporting a personalized approach to technology selection.

Teresa Ruiz Gracia, L. Nattero-Chávez, A. Martín et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Indicators to Guide Dose Titration of Weekly Basal Insulin Efsitora Alfa in Insulin-Naive and Basal Insulin-Experienced Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Analyis.

INTRODUCTION Basal insulin dose titration has historically relied on fasting self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) and hypoglycemic events. This retrospective analysis of the QWINT-2 and QWINT-3 Phase 3 trials aimed to evaluate the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived indicators for weekly insulin efsitora...

R. Bergenstal, Michael B. Davidson, David T. Ahn et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Impact of Hybrid Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in a Medical Intensive Care Unit.

In this prospective MICU cohort, real-time hybrid CGM use improved glycemic control and reduced severe hyperglycemia without increasing hypoglycemia, supporting further evaluation of structured CGM integration in critical care practice.

E. Faulds, Melanie Natasha Rayan, Molly McNett et al. · 1 citation
Mar 2026

Initial treatment for uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: A clinical trial comparing basal insulin and modified-release gliclazide

Background: The global rise of type 2 diabetes (T2D) presents significant healthcare challenges in diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. This study compares basal insulin and modified-release gliclazide to assess their effectiveness in managing glycemic control and other clinical factors in T2D patients. Methods: This...

Ebrahim Mohammadi, Laya Hooshmand Gharebagh, Maryam Hajiesmaello · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.