Aug 2026· Knowledge and Process Management· 0 citations· 14 references
TL;DR
The central claim is that knowledge management theory must expand to account for a new kind of knowledge repository: AI‐enabled systems whose behavior is shaped by the cumulative judgments of the organizations that use them.
Abstract
As organizations integrate artificial intelligence into knowledge‐intensive work, a phenomenon is emerging that knowledge management theory has yet to adequately explain: institutional knowledge can become progressively encoded into AI‐enabled organizational infrastructure through sustained patterns of human use. This paper develops that phenomenon into a formal construct, organizational AI acculturation, defined as the process through which an organization's collective knowledge, values, and decision heuristics become embedded in AI‐enabled systems through repeated human interaction, such that the systems' outputs increasingly reflect the organization's distinctive ways of framing problems and evaluating alternatives. The paper makes three contributions. First, it defines the construct and distinguishes it from adjacent concepts, including organizational memory, absorptive capacity, and transactive memory systems. Second, drawing on organizational learning theory, the resource‐based view, and dynamic capabilities, it explains how institutional knowledge encoded into AI‐enabled systems through sustained human use can become a source of competitive advantage when organizations govern the quality and renewal of what their systems encode. Third, it advances four testable propositions linking the quality of human‐AI interaction to competitive advantage, knowledge persistence under employee turnover, and adaptive capacity. Published organizational cases illustrate the construct in practice, showing that deliberate governance of human‐AI interaction can build defensible knowledge assets, whereas poor governance can stabilize error, bias, and outdated assumptions. The paper concludes with a research agenda focused on measurement, mechanism, governance, and scope conditions. The central claim is that knowledge management theory must expand to account for a new kind of knowledge repository: AI‐enabled systems whose behavior is shaped by the cumulative judgments of the organizations that use them.
A process model is developed showing how tacit knowledge generated through micro-level human–AI collaboration is externalized as articulated experiential insights, validated and simplified into shared heuristics, and ultimately codified and embedded in organizational routines to help firms to renew internal knowledge r...
Erica Wen Chen, Hongkun Tang, Ben Nanfeng Luo et al.· Management Decision· 0 citations
A structured framework for the literature and theory is built, showing how AI capability fuels innovation via interconnected knowledge processes across the organization, putting human judgment, epistemic governance, and knowledge validation at the center of how organizations learn and innovate with AI.
Vaivaw Kumar Singh· International Journal of Lat...· 0 citations
The study argues that collaborative intelligence should be viewed as an organizational capability rather than merely a technological outcome, requiring deliberate management of human judgment, ethical responsibility, and organizational design.
M. R· International Journal of Phi...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming digital knowledge systems (DKS), reshaping how organizations generate, interpret, and apply knowledge in support of organizational learning and strategic decision-making. While AI-enabled systems enhance analytical capability, predictive insight, and information processing s...
Peter L. Mkhize· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
A dynamic cognitive organization framework is proposed that shifts analysis from construct-level change to relational organization anchored in the person's current task-cognitive state under sustained AI participation, and proposes a path-specific recursive principle whereby interaction outcomes, costs, and experiences...
The framework reframes the AI productivity problem as a capability challenge rather than a computational one, clarifying the conditions under which human–AI collaboration, rather than computation itself, becomes a scarce and advantage-generating resource.
N. Nandal, Swati Luthra, Afseer Majeed et al.· International journal of bus...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.