A clinically grounded taxonomy and systematic review of artificial intelligence for cardiovascular diagnosis: From machine learning to multimodal and agentic systems
A PRISMA 2020-guided systematic review and proposed six-layer taxonomy that organizes cardiovascular AI according to diagnostic objectives, data modalities, modeling paradigms, data integration complexity, interpretability and trustworthiness, and deployment maturity provides a unified framework for organizing contemporary cardiovascular AI research.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, creating an urgent need for accurate, trustworthy, and clinically deployable artificial intelligence (AI) systems capable of supporting complex diagnostic decision-making. Although AI has advanced considerably in cardiovascular diagnosis, existing evidence remains fragmented across algorithms, data modalities, and isolated application domains, limiting a comprehensive understanding of clinically integrated AI systems. This study presents a PRISMA 2020-guided systematic review and proposes a clinically grounded six-layer taxonomy that organizes cardiovascular AI according to diagnostic objectives, data modalities, modeling paradigms, data integration complexity, interpretability and trustworthiness, and deployment maturity. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and ScienceDirect identified 226 records, of which 76 primary empirical studies met the predefined eligibility criteria and were included in the comparative evidence synthesis. The review demonstrates the evolution of cardiovascular AI from conventional machine learning applied to structured clinical data toward deep learning for physiological signals and medical imaging, followed by multimodal AI systems integrating heterogeneous clinical information. Comparative synthesis across the proposed taxonomy highlights substantial progress in predictive performance while revealing persistent challenges related to external validation, dataset representativeness, workflow integration, explainability, privacy, governance, and prospective clinical deployment. The review further distinguishes clinically validated technologies from emerging paradigms, including federated learning, foundation models, and agentic AI. Overall, the proposed taxonomy provides a unified framework for organizing contemporary cardiovascular AI research and offers a practical roadmap for evaluating the maturity, trustworthiness, and clinical readiness of next-generation intelligent diagnostic systems.
Although AI demonstrated promising diagnostic and prognostic performance across multiple cardiovascular conditions, most applications remain at the validation stage, and future research should prioritise implementation science, pragmatic evaluation, and real-world evidence to facilitate routine adoption and maximise pa...
Lucía Osoro, E. Arbelo, D. Lane et al.· Technologies· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to convert heterogeneous clinical data into actionable predictions across chronic disease pathways, yet the maturity and clinical role of AI differ substantially among diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer. This structured comparative evidence synthesis eva...
Reshmi Gopalakrishnan· Natural Resources for Human...· 0 citations
Background. Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide, yet risk stratification depends on inputs that are frequently missing in routine care. Chest radiographs and chest computed tomography (CT) are acquired in vast numbers for non-cardiac indications and contain cardiovascular information tha...
Denisse Andrea Puentes Aguila, Ana María Ángel Isaza, Roxana Rivera Valencia et al.· Genetics and Molecular Resea...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being applied in healthcare, including cardiology, with growing interest in its potential to support diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical decision-making. The rapid pace of technological advancements is not matched by equivalent progress in the regulation and appraisal of th...
Łukasz Kołtowski, M. Basza, M. Soliński et al.· European Heart Journal - Dig...· 0 citations
Although promising, LLM-based systems are not yet reliable enough for autonomous medical diagnosis, and multiple recommendations for future research are contained to ensure a high level of safety, transparency, and clinical applicability for LLMs and other AI/ML-related technologies and devices.
M. U. K. Gunawardhna, Pirunthavi Wijikumar, D. Weerasinghe· Sri Lankan Journal of Applie...· 1 citation
This review clarifies the emerging role of LLMs in cardiovascular medicine and proposes a physician-supervised framework for safe multimodal clinical integration as a testable translational framework for combining specialized AI, multimodal models, evidence retrieval, and human clinical judgment.
P. Mitrović· Journal of Clinical and Tran...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.