This work proposes Universal Continual Adversarial Defense (UCAD), a universal framework that enables both standard and robust models to perform effective defense under the CAD setting and observes that as the number of encountered attacks increases, UCAD becomes increasingly robust, consistently enhancing the defense capability of existing robust models until saturation.
This paper advocates for a forward-thinking approach that balances technical sophistication with human-centric principles, ensuring that adversarial deep learning evolves into a discipline not just of technical defense, but also of trust, transparency, and accountability.
Maisam Abbas, Ran-Zan Wang· IEEE Open Journal of the Com...· 0 citations
Evidential Adversarial Training (EV-AT), which models uncertainty through a Dirichlet distribution and combines an evidence-based loss promoting clean accuracy and reliable uncertainty with a robust evidence-alignment loss matching clean and adversarial predictions in log Dirichlet-parameter space, is proposed.
Nicolas Sournac, Ahmed Baha Ben Jmaa, B. Braeckeveldt· 0 citations
A collaborative adversarial fine-tuning framework that maintains multiple experts during training, enables knowledge exchange through embedding-space harmonization, and consolidates the learned knowledge into a single unified robust model.
Nguyen Duc Thai, Junhao Dong, Sua Qi Rong et al.· 0 citations
Adversarial training (AT) is a widely adopted defense against adversarial attacks, but its multi-step optimization process for generating adversarial examples leads to substantial computational overhead. To mitigate this, various single-step adversarial training methods have been proposed. However, these models often suffer from catastrophic overfitting under larger perturbations and exhibit degraded robustness. The core issue is that certain single-step adversarial examples, although successfully learned and correctly classified, fail to expose the true vulnerabilities of models. We refer to these misleading examples as “fakers”. Specifically, we find that fakers exhibit three distinct characteristics compared to standard adversarial examples: 1) they unexpectedly degrade the model robustness rather than improve it; 2) they make it harder for the model to learn their robust features; and 3) they show significantly greater divergence from their clean counterparts. These observations motivate us to proactively reduce the impact of fakers during training. To this end, we propose the Faker-Alleviating Single-step adversarial Training method (FAST), a general and effective framework designed to enhance both accuracy and robustness. Concretely, FAST consists of two main components. First, it dynamically adjusts the label-smoothing level for adversarial examples according to their learning difficulty, making fakers easier for the model to learn. Second, it introduces an auxiliary sample with a weak adversarial effect, derived from the single-step adversarial example, which is used to dynamically ease the alignment with clean data and stabilize the optimization process. We demonstrate the effectiveness of FAST through extensive experiments, showing that our method achieves superior clean accuracy and robustness against various types of adversarial attacks. The code is available at https://github.com/mesunhlf/FAST.
Lifeng Huang, Yuquan Lin, Chen Wan et al.· IEEE Transactions on Informa...· 0 citations
Adversarial robustness optimization aims to preserve correct prediction under adversarial perturbations, and has produced substantial robustness gains through methods such as adversarial training and adversarial purification. However, we identify a new security risk: these gains can create shared vulnerabilities across defenses. Once one representative robustness-optimized defense is effectively breached, the broader family may become exposed. Studying this risk requires separating genuine transferability from distortion-induced degradation and from the algorithmic gains of sophisticated attacks. We therefore introduce stricter transfer-only protocols and a deliberately simple adaptive attack, PGDTransfer, to test whether robustness-optimized defenses share transfer-only vulnerability under controlled conditions. We further introduce Adversarial Sensitivity Maps (AdvSMs) to visualize and quantify shared alignment beyond differentiable classifiers, including stochastic and non-differentiable defenses. Across adversarially trained classifiers, purification-based defenses, and LVLMs with robust visual encoders, we identify natural transferability within each robustness family, i.e., transfer that arises even with simple PGD-style optimization rather than specialized transferable-attack design. The risk is already severe for purification: PGDTransfer reaches an average transfer attack success rate of $80.4\%$ across filtering-, compression-, and diffusion-based purifiers under $\epsilon=4/255$, suggesting that purifier defenses may no longer provide reliable protection. As attacks improve, currently stronger robustness families may face the same risk. Future defenses should therefore treat vulnerability diversity and transfer-only isolation as security objectives, rather than optimizing only individual robustness.
Hanrui Wang, Ruihao Zheng, Shuo Wang et al.· 0 citations
This paper introduces DefendMal, a novel framework that synergistically combines Denoise Autoencoder with Sequence Squeezing, a Context-aware Adversarial Generator (CAG-AdvGAN), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) adversarial training, and a Positive–Negative Detector with Variational Autoencoder (PNDetector-VAE) to enhance robustness against evolving adversarial threats.
Dennis Benedict Crasta, Vikash Kumar· Journal of Computer Virology...· 0 citations
