Jul 2026· Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science· Vol abs/2607.21203, pp. 403-415· 0 citations· 16 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This work presents a new semantics which evaluates ontological atoms more strictly than the current semantics, which keeps the complexity of its consistency problem NP-complete, rather than increasing it to the second level of the polynomial hierarchy.
Abstract
Description logic programs are a powerful formalism for combining rules with ontologies. The well-supported semantics for description logic programs ensures that no answer sets rely on cyclic dependencies. Most popular semantics for logic programming have this property of well-supportedness. We recognize two limitations of the current well-supported semantics for DL programs: its increased computational complexity for the consistency problem and its lack of a reduct transformation characterization. In this work, we present a new semantics which evaluates ontological atoms more strictly than the current semantics. This keeps the complexity of its consistency problem NP-complete, rather than increasing it to the second level of the polynomial hierarchy. Additionally, we identify a syntactic class of description logic programs for which our new semantics is equivalent to the current semantics. We characterize our semantics using a fixpoint operator and a reduct-based transformation. Our new semantics is a strict subset of the current well-supported semantics, so it maintains the prior notion of well-supportedness while inducing its own stricter notion. We prefer our new notion of well-supportedness due to its similarities with logic programming.
This paper explores how reasoning over DL terminologies can be captured in argumentative terms, by establishing a translation into Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA), a rule-based formalism comprising defeasible assumptions, where argumentation semantics are used to retrieve sets of jointly acceptable assumptions.
Giovanni Buraglio, Federica Di, Mantas Šimkus· 0 citations
This paper looks at the results of testing deontic axioms and systems with example problems using Kripke semantics and possible worlds over accessibility relations in the context of a large ontology, and considers the notion of a sanction in a Contrary To Duty scenario.
Christopher Feener, Adam Pease, Richard Thompson· 0 citations
Relational program logics are a popular formalism for stating and proving properties that relate executions of several computations. We present Infinitary Relational Logic (IRL)—the first Hoare-style Separation Logic that allows one to state and prove relational properties of possibly infinite families of arbitrary pro...
Vladimir Gladshtein, Qi-Yuan Zhao, Yu-Xi Ling et al.· Proceedings of the ACM on Pr...· 0 citations
A uniform proof-theoretic framework for non-contingency logic over a broad class of frame conditions is developed based on generalized path conditions (GPCs), a grammar-theoretic formalism that uniformly captures many standard modal frame properties.
This work proposes to consider the three refined GAS principles as alternative principles for answer set semantics in general and for answer set and world view construction in particular and analyzes the computational complexity of well-supportedness and the rational answer set and world view semantics.
Yi-Dong Shen, Thomas Eiter· ACM Transactions on Computat...· 0 citations
A coNEXPTIME upper bound for the validity problem of RmbC and a coNP-hardness lower bound are established, and coNP-completeness for the principal extensions containing one of the six minimal explosive pairs are proved.
M. Coniglio, Héctor Federico Mallea· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.