ASCon is proposed, a direction-aware reciprocal \textbf{A}gent--\textbf{S}tep \textbf{Con}textualization model for multiple failure attribution targets that introduces direction-aware graph attention to model execution context, masked step-to-agent attention to construct behavior-aware agent representations, and agent-conditioned step contextualization to incorporate agent context back into step representations.
Abstract
Failure attribution in LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) aims to answer who caused failures, when they occurred, and why by identifying responsible targets including faulty agents, erroneous steps, and failure modes. Existing methods have primarily focused on developing dedicated models for specific attribution targets, with limited attention to the evidential dependencies among them. Despite these attribution targets are different, they rely on common diagnostic evidence from MAS trajectories, including task constraints, agent roles, behavioral histories and inter-agent interactions. This commonality motivates us to develop a unified representation model that aggregates the trajectory evidence into individual agent and step representations, which can subsequently be adapted to different attribution targets. Accordingly, we propose ASCon, a direction-aware reciprocal \textbf{A}gent--\textbf{S}tep \textbf{Con}textualization model for multiple failure attribution targets. ASCon introduces direction-aware graph attention to model execution context, masked step-to-agent attention to construct behavior-aware agent representations, and agent-conditioned step contextualization to incorporate agent context back into step representations. The resulting contextualized representations enable different attribution targets through lightweight target-specific heads. Experiments show that ASCon can improve faulty-agent detection by 5.83\%+ in micro-accuracy, faulty-step detection by 10.63\%+ in micro-accuracy, and failure-mode detection by 14.73\%+ in Macro-F1. Meanwhile, it can also substantially enhance the LLM-based methods'attribution capabilities in out-of-domain scenarios.
DCFA is proposed, a training-free framework for failure attribution that integrates a global module that constructs structured causal-inspired dependency graphs from system traces to identify the initial decisive error, and a local module that applies local counterfactual-inspired reasoning to refine causal-inspired at...
Ze-Hao Wang, Lanjun Wang, Shi-Long Jin et al.· 1 citation
The generalizability of the diagnose-then-correct paradigm is established and it is demonstrated that in low-resource settings, focusing reflection on reasoning steps after the decisive error step achieves comparable quality to reflecting on the complete failure trajectory.
Xiao-Qing Wang, Ke-Man Huang, Bin Liang et al.· 0 citations
Large language model (LLM) agent failures often contain multiple related errors rather than a single mistake. Existing attribution methods usually identify a responsible agent, step, or root cause, but do not explicitly model dependency between errors. We introduce EDGE, an Error Dependency Graph-guided multi-Error att...
Jun Hou, Priya Pitre, Yi Fang et al.· 4 citations· ⚡1
AFANet is introduced, a lightweight graph-based framework that models interaction trajectories through step-level semantic signals and agent-level relationships and suggests that effective agent failure attribution does not require heavy LLM reasoning and a lightweight, structured approach can achieve strong performanc...
Ting-Wei Li, Yuan-Chen Bei, Xiao Lin et al.· 1 citation
DUOTRACE follows a detect-before-attribute paradigm: it first detects anomalous executions and then supplies focused trajectory evidence to downstream LLM-based attribution methods, which improves agent-level and step-level attribution accuracy.
Jia-Yi Zhang, Ze-Xin Wang, DecisionMakingRon Sun et al.· 1 citation
Adaptive Influence Graphs is introduced, a two-stage agentic framework that first transforms a failed trace into a structured graph and then navigates it to identify the critical error and establishes a new state of the art on Who&When, the standard benchmark for multi-agent failure attribution.
Yarden Bakish, Amir Dudai, Roy Ganz et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.