CLEAR-DC is set out, a framework coupling a control-policy branch to a workload-demand branch through an explicit elasticity term, reads out net rather than direct benefit, and emits a schema-conformant record covering energy, carbon, water, embodied share and validation venue.
Abstract
Data centers are increasingly optimized by artificial intelligence and, at the same time, increasingly loaded by it. The literature treats these as two unrelated problems: control studies model workload as an exogenous arrival process, while sustainability studies model infrastructure as a fixed multiplier. We screen roughly 194 papers retrieved through a documented protocol, code 63 of them, and report what the coding shows. Of 28 primary control-oriented studies, 18 are validated in simulation alone and 5 reach physical hardware or a production facility; none account for water withdrawal, and none account for embodied carbon. Reported savings intervals across four technique families overlap almost completely, which means the field cannot presently rank its own methods. Ten recurring gaps are scored for consequence and tractability, and we set out CLEAR-DC, a framework coupling a control-policy branch to a workload-demand branch through an explicit elasticity term, reads out net rather than direct benefit, and emits a schema-conformant record covering energy, carbon, water, embodied share and validation venue. The framework is an architectural and methodological proposal, not a trained system; the contribution we defend empirically is the corpus analysis and the reporting schema derived from it. Coding sheet, derived statistics and all result artifacts: https://github.com/Kimalice/AI-for-Energy-Optimization-in-Data-Centers-Closing-the-Optimizer-Load-Loop
Data centers consumed 415 TWh of electricity in 2024, about 1.5% of global demand, and foundation model training and inference are a growing part of this load. As training and inference continue to grow, energy-efficient foundation models are becoming essential. An efficiency gain may come from the model, the accelerat...
Koushik Bhupathiraju, Ranjot S. Matharoo, Hellen Mwangi et al.· Computers· 0 citations
A carbon-aware co-optimization framework that schedules checkpoint intervals, workload migration, dynamic voltage and frequency scaling, and behind-the-meter storage jointly with unit commitment, pricing system CO2 emissions beyond the market-internalized level, with split-conformal scenario bands and an out-of-sample...
Jun-Qing Zhang, Yi Wang· Sustainability· 0 citations
A critical review of energy storage systems (ESSs) as the key enabling technology for reliable grid integration of AI DCs and identifies open research challenges and future directions at the intersection of AI computing infrastructure and power system integration.
Sina Mohammadi, W. Wang, Marcus Chen et al.· 0 citations
It is shown that electricity use by data centers built for artificial intelligence could rise from about 118 terawatt-hours in 2024 to between 239 and 295 terawatt-hours by 2030, which indicates that artificial intelligence infrastructure is becoming a structural part of power-system dynamics.
Dan-Bo Chen, Zi-Jun Zhou, Yong-Yang Cai et al.· Communications Sustainabilit...· 1 citation
This critical review examines the emerging challenges associated with resource management in AI-driven data centers by focusing on the interplay between computational growth and environmental constraints, and provides insights into pathways for a more sustainable AI infrastructure.
RAPID is proposed, a region-aware and power-informed scheduling framework that integrates static and online heuristic schedulers for large-scale AI request scheduling that significantly reduces carbon emissions, electricity costs, and total energy consumption.
B. Ding, Cai-Ning Wang, Ka-Fei Tang et al.· Sustainability· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.