This paper proposes environment evolution, which incrementally increases environment difficulty off-policy and schedules the evolved environments generation by generation during training to provide continuous learning signals.
Abstract
Scaling interactive and verifiable environments is critical for training terminal agents. As frontier models become more capable, environments synthesized from scratch become less challenging and thus provide limited learning signals. Recent co-evolution methods iteratively synthesize environments near the model's learnable frontier based on weaknesses exposed during rollouts. However, their dependence on on-policy rollouts limits generalization and the continuous provision of learning signals as the model becomes stronger. In this paper, we propose environment evolution, which incrementally increases environment difficulty off-policy and schedules the evolved environments generation by generation during training to provide continuous learning signals. We derive three evolution directions that influence environment difficulty from the multi-turn learning objective and then implement evolution along these directions through a loop-engineered multi-agent harness. Quantitative rollout experiments with Hy4 preview, Claude Opus 5, and GPT-5.6 Sol show that environment evolution consistently produces more difficult environments. We validate its effectiveness on Qwen3.6-27B and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B through simple long-horizon RL training, improving their performance by 14.4 and 18.0 percentage points on Terminal-Bench 2.1, respectively.
River, a simple training recipe that improves reward quality by filtering low-quality environments and augmenting outcome rewards with process-level behavior regularization is proposed, which achieves the best performance among evaluated open-source RL-trained 8B models across four terminal-agent benchmarks.
Yi-Fan Yao, Bo Pang, Xuan-Phi Nguyen et al.· 2 citations
Executable environments enable LLM agents to learn from the consequences of their actions. For embodied agents, those consequences extend beyond whether the current task succeeds: completing a delivery can consume the time, energy, or money needed for later work. Learning to plan therefore requires environments that pr...
Haoqiang Kang, Yi-Ming Zhang, Yi-Yang Guo et al.· 2 citations
This work introduces AgentMercury, a scalable framework for synthesizing executable environments from high-level business scenarios that improves substantially on both enterprise workflows and out-of-domain benchmarks spanning reasoning, coding, scientific computing, and tool use.
This work introduces AGNI, an automated pipeline that extracts trajectory-relevant assumptions, injects targeted environmental changes, and validates that the resulting novel tasks remain solvable and highlights a gap between task competence and adaptive capability and motivate environmental variation as a core dimensi...
Janvijay Singh, Vaishnavi Shrivastava, Dilek Hakkani-Tur et al.· 0 citations
Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLMs) continuously accumulate experience through interaction, creating an opportunity to improve future behavior through self-evolution. A fundamental challenge is how to transform abundant, task-specific interaction experience into reusable model competence without s...
Wen-Bo Gao, Zhao-Mou Song, Zhi-Yuan Ji et al.· 1 citation
UnifiedPlayers, a cooperative framework comprising a Planning Player that generates tasks, an Execution Player that produces multi-turn trajectories with Python tool calls, and an Evaluation Player that constructs executable verifiers, highlights cooperation among specialized players as a promising path toward self-enh...
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.