GazeFS improves Focus target centering and empirical residual contraction while leaving temporal smoothness as a separate objective and introduces GazeFS, which maps a variable-length gaze-head history to the next target-center direction and a short-horizon Search/Focus estimate without target information at inference.
Abstract
Target-centered gaze interaction requires more than suppressing frame-to-frame fluctuations: target acquisition produces task-aligned changes in gaze-head dynamics, while a gaze trace may retain a persistent target-relative residual direction. We formulate gaze correction as online target-centered gaze-trajectory forecasting and stabilization and introduce GazeFS, which maps a variable-length gaze-head history to the next target-center direction and a short-horizon Search/Focus estimate without target information at inference. Across 7,960 acquisition episodes from 30 participants, Search-Focus differences remain stable under quality control, onset exclusion, and duration matching. History windows improve phase decoding over the current endpoint, but explicit task progress remains a strong control. Under the 30-participant, five-fold grouped out-of-fold protocol across three seeds, the reductions relative to raw hold in Focus episode bias, within-episode dispersion, and P90 target error are 0.182 degrees, 0.257 degrees, and 0.400 degrees, with participant-bootstrap 95% confidence intervals excluding zero. Endpoint-free replay from empty history preserves the Focus advantage and yields raw-network phase balanced accuracy/AUPRC of 0.925/0.993; coordinate controls further show that recent history contributes beyond explicit progress metadata. GazeFS therefore improves Focus target centering and empirical residual contraction while leaving temporal smoothness as a separate objective.
Egocentric gaze prediction enables many downstream applications but remains challenging, as human gaze is inherently stochastic. This stochasticity is constrained by structured temporal dynamics alternating between fixations and saccades, top-down influences from tasks, and bottom-up visual saliency. Based on this obse...
Within-model ablations, which keep the encoder and the rest of the architecture fixed and vary only the gaze history, show that the differential formulation removes the systematic saccade bias that persists even with an absolute gaze-history prior.
Interpersonal distance is a fundamental social cue, yet it remains unclear whether repeated exposure to gaze-triggered approach or recede animations is associated with subsequent gaze allocation. This study examined whether such gaze-triggered changes in apparent interpersonal distance were associated with changes in d...
Can-Ling An, Soichiro Matsuda· Attention, Perception, & Psy...· 0 citations
The Causal Context-Gated Forecaster (CCGF), which encodes a 60-frame pre-dropout history of gaze and head pose and combines it with DINOv3 scene features and evaluates two scene conditions: Live, in which the scene representation continues to update during tracker loss, and Frozen, in which the final pre-dropout repres...
Fixation behaviour can vary with both oculomotor control processes and visual target properties. Previous studies have frequently used high-sampling-rate gaze-position recordings to characterise fixation dynamics, particularly at fine temporal resolution. The present study focuses on gaze-position characteristics at te...
Yang Gao, Sen Li, Shan Fu et al.· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
Overall, unconditional diffusion captures local gaze kinematics and short-range temporal and directional structure, while long-range properties such as saccade counts and cumulative path geometry remain targets for future conditioned models.
Laxman Basnet, Alexander Szorkovszky, Pedro G. Lind et al.· 0 citations
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduJul 7, 2026
The professor of physics and inaugural director of the NSF AI Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions will lead LNS and continue his research in particle physics.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.