Feb 2026· arXiv.org· Vol abs/2602.10009· 1 citation· 108 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
It is shown that translating simulation traces to a sparse representation of "high-level"structural patterns leads to more effective interpretation by LLMs, and an unsupervised learning scheme to perform this translation, or annotation, via program synthesis is proposed.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are unable to reliably reason about specific physical systems. Attempts to imbue LLMs with knowledge of the necessary physics concepts have shown great promise, but explainability and validation remain open challenges. An emerging alternative is tooling, where LLMs can query physical simulators and use the resulting simulation traces as context for validation. This approach suffers from poor scalability since simulation traces contain large volumes of fine-grained numerical and semantic data. We show that translating simulation traces to a sparse representation of"high-level"structural patterns leads to more effective interpretation by LLMs. We propose an unsupervised learning scheme to perform this translation, or annotation, via program synthesis. Our learning results in a library of programs that act as pattern detectors which can translate simulation traces to sparse, annotated pattern sequences. The detected patterns may optionally be guided by human experts via string labels (rigid collision, stretching spring, etc.). We show, using a recent physics benchmark, that such annotated representations are more amenable to natural language reasoning about specific physical systems. The synthesized programs serve as transparent, explainable functions that map system states to a sparse and efficient annotation space. As an example application, we show how goals within physical systems that are specified in natural language may be converted to reward programs which are maximized to find solutions.
DatalogBench is presented, a benchmark of 136 text-to-Datalog synthesis tasks curated from existing Datalog-based artifacts that identifies recursive reasoning and decomposition as open challenges for current LLMs and agents, and offers a reliable, execution-grounded measure of both.
Yuan Li, Han-Yun Jiang, Guo-Wei Tian et al.· 0 citations
Extracting physics information from modern particle-physics experiments requires multistage analyses implemented on top of large and highly interconnected software ecosystems. General-purpose large language models (LLMs) often produce unreliable programs for such tasks because a user request alone rarely specifies the...
LLM-based code generation fails when correctness depends on execution-dependent coupling: the meaning of one routine is defined by the runtime behavior of another, a relationship that cannot be resolved from textual descriptions alone. This limitation, which we call static binding, is not confined to explicitly coupled...
Gnaneswar Villuri, Hashmath Shaik, Alex Doboli· 1 citation
Reliable tool use requires more than triggering a mechanism or matching a query to an API description. Before selecting a specific tool, an agent must first infer the capability requirements implied by the user query. In this paper, we investigate whether these query-side capability requirements are linearly decodable...
Kyo-Nam Choo, Mi-Ra Song, Yun-Ju Kang et al.· 0 citations
HEPToolBench is introduced, a benchmark of 28 collider-simulation tasks scored by deterministic, task-specific scorers, plus a three-task structured-debugging extension, and moving syntax generation into deterministic software can substantially improve reliability for both small local and frontier models.
The PAU (Python API Understanding) benchmark is introduced, where models are provided with black-box, API-level access to code snippets, and inspiration is taken from the Asymmetric Actor Critic paradigm, frequently used in robot learning, to post-train models for interactive code understanding.
Dhananjay Ashok, Jesse Thomason, Jonathan May· 0 citations
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduJul 7, 2026
The professor of physics and inaugural director of the NSF AI Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions will lead LNS and continue his research in particle physics.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.