Skip to content

No-Regret Bayesian Optimization with Finite-Library Input-Warped Kernels

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 16 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

Finite-Library Input-Warped Bayesian Optimization (FLIWBO), which selects warps from a finite library of smooth input maps by any history-dependent rule, and adapts the input geometry to accelerate learning while retaining high-probability convergence guarantees under mild hypotheses, with an explicit library-size cost.

Abstract

Gaussian-process Bayesian optimization (GP-BO) excels at black-box optimization of costly functions, e.g., hyperparameter optimization (HPO) and multi-agent system (MAS) design. Convergence-rate guarantees exist for select methods, notably GP upper confidence bound (GP-UCB), but require a fixed kernel. Critically, the kernel encodes how input proximity affects objective value similarity. When raw coordinates poorly match this geometry - as with log-scaled hyperparameters or localized peaks - input warping can greatly improve sample efficiency, yet known GP-UCB proofs require a fixed kernel. We propose Finite-Library Input-Warped Bayesian Optimization (FLIWBO), which selects warps from a finite library of smooth input maps by any history-dependent rule. It adapts the input geometry to accelerate learning while retaining high-probability convergence guarantees under mild hypotheses, with an explicit $\sqrt(N_\varepsilon)$ library-size cost. Controlled diagnostics show that finite-library warping repairs planted geometry mismatches and identify FLIWBO failure cases. Across four repeated benchmarks - warped synthetic objectives, a confidence-fence trap, and Fashion-MNIST HPO - FLIWBO-UCB beats raw-coordinate GP-UCB under misspecified geometry, escapes traps that defeat even oracle-warp expected improvement, and recovers much of the gain from manual log scaling, while leading the tested methods that admit a matching regret guarantee. A 20-dimensional MAS design study further shows feasibility under costly noisy evaluations. Code for experiments is available: https://github.com/edvin-ketabati/bogp-paper-experiments.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Enhancing Bayesian Optimization and Active Learning Through Kernel Diversity

A unified framework, KENDO (Kernel ENsemble Disagreement-aware Operator), is proposed that integrates Ensemble Gaussian Processes (EGP) with disagreement-aware acquisition strategies and extends the approach to multi-objective optimization via random scalarization that preserves the single-optimizer conditioning struct...

Heng Zhang, Hao-Tian Xiang, Konstantinos D. Polyzos et al. · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Isotropic Gaussian Processes Improve Vanilla Bayesian Optimization in High Dimensions

High-dimensional Bayesian optimization (BO) often fits Gaussian process (GP) surrogates from far fewer observations than input dimensions. Modern Vanilla BO can perform well in this regime with dimension-aware priors, initialization, and acquisition optimization, but it typically retains automatic relevance determinati...

Wei-Ting Tang, Madhav R. Muthyala, Joel A. Paulson · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Robust Bayesian Optimization with Q-Exponential Surrogates

Bayesian optimization (BO) is a widely used framework for optimizing expensive black-box objectives, but standard BO methods often use Gaussian process (GP) surrogates whose Gaussian assumption is sensitive to outliers and heavy-tailed noise. We introduce q-ED-BO, a robust BO method whose surrogate follows a univariate...

Richard Cornelius Suwandi, Zhi-Di Lin, Feng Yin et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Convex-Concave Reinforcement Learning

The per-iteration program is solved with sequential convex programming (SCP), the standard solver for difference-of-convex problems, and convergence guarantees under mild conditions are given, bridging the difference-of-convex optimization and RL literatures.

Shripad Deshmukh, Yaswanth Chittepu, Dhawal Gupta et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Bayesian Optimization with Rich Auxiliary Information via LLMs

Two methods are introduced, AuxBO-Evolve, which uses auxiliary information to evolve beliefs over the location of the optimum, and AuxBO-Vicinity, which uses it to locally guide the acquisition function, which consistently improve optimization performance and outperform standard BO and existing LLM-based approaches.

Efe Mert Karagözlü, Rohit Sonker, Tejus Gupta et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.