Sep 2026· AI & SOCIETY· 0 citations· 39 references
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
TL;DR
The results show that trust in AI is shaped by both psychological predispositions and broader beliefs about the trustworthiness of political and scientific institutions, and highlight how national context shapes public confidence in emerging technologies.
Abstract
What drives public trust in artificial intelligence (AI)? This study examines the individual and institutional foundations of AI trust across two contrasting democracies: Japan and the United Kingdom. Drawing on original survey data (
N
= 3235), we test a set of hypotheses derived from trust-transfer perspectives and self-efficacy research, covering institutional trust, AI self-efficacy, technological optimism, perceived societal threat, and job displacement anxiety. The results show that trust in AI is shaped by both psychological predispositions and broader beliefs about the trustworthiness of political and scientific institutions. Trust in government, university scientists, and other people consistently predicts AI trust in both countries, even when controlling for demographic and attitudinal variables. While optimism about AI’s benefits increases trust in both contexts, fear of AI plays a stronger negative role in the UK. Unexpectedly, the belief that AI will replace one’s job is positively associated with trust in Japan but unrelated in the UK. These findings highlight how national context shapes public confidence in emerging technologies and point to the importance of governance frameworks that foster informed capability and institutional legitimacy.
The findings suggest that the perceived intelligence of military AI does not reflect an independent assessment of system capability, but emerges from cognitive, affective and moral evaluations triggered by its intended use.
O. Parlangeli, Antonio Brancati, Giorgia Callori et al.· Proceedings of the 2026 Euro...· 0 citations
Apocalyptic narratives about Artificial Intelligence (AI), in which a future superintelligence dominates or annihilates humanity, have become a prominent source of public anxiety and a central concern in the AI alignment discourse. Because the behavior of a hypothetical superintelligent AI is fundamentally unknowable,...
Enrico Cipriani, D. Menicucci, Simone Grassini· Proceedings of the 2026 Euro...· 0 citations
Since the advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI), interactions between humans and AI have greatly changed society. Previous research indicates that AI's effectiveness depends on individuals' cognitive and emotional trust, and that increasing AI agency also affects its perceived trustworthiness. However, it i...
Aki Nagano· 6th Current Issues in Busine...· 0 citations
The article proposes a reframing of alignment from an ethical-pedagogical project to an institutional one: instead of presuming or attempting to cultivate artificial moral agents on the basis of behavioral proxies, governance should focus on designing legal, technical, and organizational structures that constrain and r...
The findings suggest that trustworthy AI integration requires addressing pre-existing structural failures before introducing algorithmic decision support, and offer design recommendations for AI-supported appraisal systems, with implications for HCI research and organizational practice.
Andreas Harnindito, Akshat Sawarni· Proceedings of the 2026 Euro...· 0 citations
Hundreds of millions of people obtain information from the same AI models. Does their trust in AI depend on the technology or societal institutions? In an incentivized cross-country experiment, participants (N=2,928) trust identical GPT-4o answers differently, with a 0.57SD gap between the US and Kenya. Combining the e...
Sanchaita Hazra, Marta Serra-Garcia· CESifo working papers· 0 citations