A Physics-Informed Hybrid Method for Rapid Constant-Power State-of-Power Evaluation of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Abstract

In short-duration power-support applications of energy storage stations, state of power (SOP) estimation should reflect the constant-power boundary over the target horizon, while constant-current extrapolation may misrepresent the current rise caused by voltage decline. This study proposes a 30 s constant-power SOP evaluation framework for portable inspection, decoupling parameter inversion from boundary propagation. The method uses a single-particle model with electrolyte dynamics (SPMe) with degradation factors for ohmic resistance, kinetics, and diffusion. The ohmic degradation factor is determined through time-zero voltage-drop hard calibration, while the kinetic and diffusion degradation factors are identified from 30 s constant-current pulse responses using physics-informed neural network (PINN)-based inversion, and the constant-power boundary is solved by Runge–Kutta integration and bisection search. In model-consistent closed-loop verification, which assesses numerical and inversion consistency under matched-model assumptions rather than independent physical accuracy, the method achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.100%, a 95th-percentile error of 0.503%, and a maximum error of 2.019%, below the constant-current approximation and first-order equivalent circuit model baselines within the matched-model synthetic setting. Its Jetson Nano-equivalent runtime was approximately 0.630 s. An external proxy comparison using 154 discharge pulses from a public HPPC dataset for an LCO-graphite cell showed an MAE of 0.41 W relative to the pulse-power proxy. This result measures agreement with the selected pulse-power proxy rather than accuracy against a strictly defined 30 s constant-power ground truth. The 10 mV-noise case increased the SOP MAE to 3.868%, indicating substantial sensitivity to voltage-measurement disturbance and the need for validated signal conditioning. These results indicate a physically interpretable and computationally feasible candidate framework for rapid battery power screening, while direct constant-power experiments, broader chemistry coverage, and measured-noise validation remain necessary before field deployment.