Aug 2026· Journal of Environmental Management· Vol 416, pp.
130710
· 0 citations· 32 references
Medicine
TL;DR
A database of 280 experimental records and 20 descriptors was compiled to predict adsorption capacity and interpret descriptor-performance relationships, and the framework supports interpretable prediction and hypothesis generation for gaseous arsenic adsorption by metal oxides.
Abstract
Identifying descriptors associated with gaseous arsenic adsorption by metal oxides remains challenging because literature data are heterogeneous and incomplete. A database of 280 experimental records and 20 descriptors from 17 studies was compiled to predict adsorption capacity and interpret descriptor-performance relationships. Mean, k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and inference-based imputation strategies were combined with gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) and particle swarm optimization-tuned GBDT (PSO-GBDT) models. Among six configurations, the PSO-GBDT model trained on the inference-imputed dataset achieved the lowest five-fold cross-validation RMSE of 2.10 mg/g and test-set R2, RMSE, and MAE values of 0.98, 1.54 mg/g, and 0.71 mg/g, respectively. Permutation feature importance (PFI) and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) showed that operating and gas-phase descriptors dominated predictions, with H2O concentration and adsorption time ranked highest, followed by adsorption temperature, As2O3 concentration, Fe content, and average pore diameter. Partial dependence plots (PDPs) associated higher predicted capacities with longer adsorption times, higher As2O3 concentrations, larger pore diameters, and lower adsorption temperatures within the compiled data range. As an exploratory application, the model prioritized Fe-Mn adsorbents containing 63%-81.5% Fe and 18.5%-37% Mn with pore diameters of 20-24 nm, corresponding to predicted capacities of 20-21.2 mg/g. Subsequent screening over broader operating ranges predicted a high-capacity region of 53-54.1 mg/g at As2O3 concentrations of 110-200 ppm, adsorption times of 48-240 min, and temperatures of 300-600 °C. Overall, the framework supports interpretable prediction and hypothesis generation for gaseous arsenic adsorption by metal oxides.
This work presents a machine learning-symbolic regression strategy to develop a physically interpretable formula for predicting low pressure CO2 adsorption capacity in hypothetical metal-organic frameworks (hMOFs), and proposes a physics-guided expression that enables efficient prediction and provides clearer insight i...
Yimin Shao, Sheng-Ling Ma, Sheng-Hong Ju et al.· 0 citations
Accurate prediction of shale methane adsorption capacity is crucial for reservoir evaluation. This study integrates 486 experimental datasets to develop a multivariate machine learning prediction model. Six key geological parameters, including depth, total organic carbon (TOC), moisture, porosity, vitrinite reflectan...
Hong-Jian Zhu, Ning Zhang, Zong-Quan Hu et al.· Frontiers in Earth Science· 0 citations
A realistic performance boundary is outlined for bulk-to-surface ML in this benchmark: O* can be very coarsely prioritized from bulk descriptors within a limited domain, whereas H* and OH* are unlikely to be quantitatively predicted from bulk descriptors alone and would benefit from surface-aware models.
Despite the rapid adoption of machine learning (ML) in materials discovery, its application to water contaminant adsorption remains fundamentally constrained. In this study, we systematically evaluated whether current peer-reviewed literature on magnetite nanoparticle (MNPs) adsorbents contains sufficient descriptor...
A. I. Yunus, Jacob Song, Samuel Darko et al.· ACS ES&T Water· 0 citations
Introduction: Machine learning (ML) techniques have been increasingly applied to model Heavy metals (HMs) adsorption from aqueous environments; however, variations in datasets, evaluation strategies, and reporting practices have limited the development of generalizable conclusions regarding model performance. This syst...
Roghayeh Hatami, A. Dalvand, Omid Yousefianzadeh· Journal of Environmental Hea...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.