This work proposes treating long-term agent memory as a distinct data model -- with its own write semantics (encoding, separation, consolidation, provenance) and read semantics (cue-driven activation across a linked memory graph) and presents FluctlightDB, an embedded engine that implements this contract via experience() and activate().
Abstract
For fifty years, data systems have answered two questions. The relational model asked which records match a predicate; the vector model asked which vectors lie nearest a query. Neither was built for cue-driven, provenance-weighted recall across long sessions. We propose treating long-term agent memory as a distinct data model -- with its own write semantics (encoding, separation, consolidation, provenance) and read semantics (cue-driven activation across a linked memory graph) -- and present FluctlightDB, an embedded engine that implements this contract via experience() and activate(). We make that case carefully, not categorically: we do not claim novelty over Mem0, Zep, or HippoRAG-style memory layers, only an embedded engine contract beneath them. On LoCoMo (official evidence-recall metric; 10 conversations, 1,982 gold spans), CHORUS recalls 99.0% on an internally reproduced July 2026 run. On LongMemEval-S (500 questions, official session_recall@8), our retrieval harness scores 97.6% (488/500); end-to-end QA with our reader/judge stack scores 97.4% (487/500) -- these layers use different protocols than vendor leaderboard figures we cite for context only. On BEIR SciFact (shared MiniLM embeddings, same harness, Recall Fabric on), CHORUS/PRISM edges Chroma on nDCG@10 (0.646 vs. 0.645) and Recall@10 (0.792 vs. 0.783). We also report a small author-designed regression suite (FAMB; paraphrase n=10, other sub-tests n=1) at 100% macro -- internal validation, not peer benchmark. Strangers can verify the engine in under a minute via pip install"fluctlightdb[native]"and a minimal connect() ->experience() ->activate() script (compiled wheel, not source-only). Harnesses and frozen JSON are MIT-licensed. We claim no new neuroscience and no new transformer; we propose a missing layer of the data stack and release an engine others can reproduce and contest.
SodaMem is presented, an evidence-grounded temporal graph memory that extracts typed FactEvents with mandatory provenance spans, persists mention time, occurrence time, and validity with SUPERSEDES/CONTRADICTS/UPDATES edges under hybrid lexical-dense indexing and answers via a planner-reader loop that gathers citable evidence before composing a final response.
This paper argues that Muscle Memory - the practice of compiling recurring user intent into purpose-built specialist agents - is a distinct memory paradigm from retrieval, and argues that compilation is a better fit for the workloads where current assistants impose a multi-turn tax on their users.
Conversational AI agents commonly lack persistent memory across sessions. The obvious fixes like injecting full chat histories into the context window, or delegating to a third-party memory service, either exhaust the model's context budget or send personal data through infrastructure the user does not control. We describe a memory store that avoids both problems: an agent-local Neo4j property graph augmented with HNSW vector indexes and a full bitemporal data model. Each memory is stored as an immutable identity node linked to versioned content nodes carrying two closed-open time intervals: valid time (when the fact was true in the world) and transaction time (when the database recorded it). This design supports point-in-time semantic retrieval without physically overwriting history. Semantic edges between related memories are maintained automatically at write time using cosine similarity over 1024-dimensional embeddings. We evaluate the system on LongMemEval, a 500-question benchmark spanning six question types designed to stress long-term memory. Across 60 sampled questions, the current-state semantic search path achieves 46.7% R@10 overall, rising to 80% on knowledge-update questions. The time-travel path yields 80% R@10 on knowledge-update but decreases recall on temporal-reasoning questions (50% to 37.5%), a consequence of post-filter dilution that points directly to a concrete design improvement. We discuss what these results reveal about the limits of pure retrieval for different question types and what each failure mode suggests for future work.
Long-term memory systems store what a user says in an external store and retrieve it when a related query arrives. This interface rests on an assumption so natural that it is rarely stated: a memory that is needed will resemble the query that needs it. World knowledge breaks the assumption. A tree-nut allergy should change the answer to a macaron request through their almond-flour ingredient, yet the two texts share no cue a retriever can see. We call this failure mode the implicit-association blind spot and introduce InMind, a 125-task, expert-verified benchmark spanning ten life domains, with 113 tasks grounded in citable public sources. Its paired controls separate three explanations that existing evaluations conflate: the fact was never stored, the model lacks the bridging knowledge, or the fact was stored and never surfaced. The verdict is clean. With the decisive memory placed in context, the backbone answers 84.0 percent of indirect queries; when the same memory must be retrieved, six vector, graph, and agentic memory systems reach at most 14.4 percent, even though they recall the same facts on demand at up to 100 percent. An embedding with eight times the dimensionality raises answer-blind target recall for every system yet leaves the gap essentially intact. A minimal diagnostic probe that keeps memory visible before the query arrives recovers most of the gap, locating the failure in the query-conditioned interface itself and pointing to routing, deciding which facts must stay visible, as the open problem InMind is built to score.
Ruizhe Li, Mingxuan Du, Benfeng Xu et al.· 0 citations
Long-lived AI agents require continuity across interactions, but continuity cannot be obtained by simply extending the prompt window. An agent must preserve useful prior experience, retrieve it selectively, distinguish personal context from external evidence, and revise memory when the underlying situation changes. We propose an architectural memory substrate organized along two orthogonal axes: a representational axis spanning structured records, vector representations, and graph relations; and a temporal axis spanning short-term traces, medium-term abstractions, and long-term semantic commitments. Its key design constraint is synchronized structured-vector-graph memory: structured records govern eligibility, vector representations support recall, and graph relations adjudicate support, contradiction, and supersession before gated context projection. Its central claim is that reliable personalization is a memory design problem: useful memory is structured, selectively exposed, continuously consolidated, and epistemically labeled rather than stored as undifferentiated conversation history. Beyond the framework, we instantiate MRMS as a lightweight prototype implementing structured records, vector retrieval, temporal policies, and graph-based revision. The prototype exercises the core substrate mechanisms through pre-generation memory selection, revision, boundary enforcement, and evidence attribution under controlled long-lived interaction scenarios with explicit evidence requirements.
Agent-memory workloads mix direct factual lookup, relation-chain and current-state reasoning, and broad synthesis over long histories. We describe Supra Cognitive Modes (SCM), an architecture that maps explicit or automatically selected per-query modes to retrieval and synthesis payloads over one shared ingest substrate. A frozen semantic classifier and runtime gates dispatch queries among fused lexical and dense lookup, graph or iterative multi-hop handling, and stratified long-form synthesis. The substrate combines multi-granularity embeddings, extracted triples, fact-version metadata, and optional asynchronous enrichments. We characterize the deployed configuration on three benchmarks: Long-term Conversational Memory (LoCoMo; n = 1,986), MemoryAgentBench (MAB; n = 3,671), and LongMemEval (n = 500). The reference run records 84.87% on LoCoMo factoid categories and 68.61% on adversarial abstention, 61.49% on MAB across two repetitions, and 86.00% on LongMemEval. A repository-backed reproduction produces similar aggregate scores and supports task- and mode-conditioned failure analysis. Raw baseline outputs, aligned end-to-end timing for LoCoMo and LongMemEval, and complete token ledgers are unavailable; stored rows also omit some final runtime decisions. The results characterize one implemented routed configuration and its diagnostic failure patterns, while source inspection verifies the per-query control interface and shared-substrate design. Causal routing effects, efficiency gains, and statistical significance remain outside the available evidence.
