This paper gives a sampling problem that is solvable by shallow quantum circuits, hard for polynomial-time classical algorithms under lattice-based assumptions, and efficiently verifiable by a classical computer, and shows that shallow quantum circuits have sufficient structure to solve certain classically hard tasks whose solutions can be verified efficiently.
Abstract
We give a sampling problem that is solvable by shallow quantum circuits, hard for polynomial-time classical algorithms under lattice-based assumptions, and efficiently verifiable by a classical computer. The quantum sampler admits two implementations: one uses log-logarithmic-depth quantum circuits with one- and two-qubit gates, i.e., $\mathsf{QNC}^0[\log\log]$ circuits, while the other uses constant-depth quantum circuits with unbounded fan-in gates, i.e., $\mathsf{QAC}^0$ circuits. Our construction can be seen as compiling the Learning with Errors (LWE)-based single-round proof of quantumness of Arabadjieva et al. (2025) to very low depth. The price paid for this compilation is the reliance on less standard, though well-motivated, assumptions: in addition to the lattice knowledge assumption used by Arabadjieva et al. (2025), we require a strengthened variant of the adaptive-hardcore-bit property of LWE, for which we provide supporting evidence. Unlike previous low-depth proofs of quantumness, the quantum computation here requires no mid-circuit measurements or feed-forward: it consists only of running a shallow circuit and sampling from its output distribution. This shows that shallow quantum circuits have sufficient structure to solve certain classically hard tasks whose solutions can be verified efficiently.
Computational self-testing gives a classical verifier command over the quantum register of a single computationally bounded prover. We use this framework to construct the first argument system for BQP with quasilinear total resource requirements in the circuit model. Our argument system is based on the learning with er...
The results show that precise Haar-like statistics can emerge from sparse commuting dynamics with remarkably low quantum resources, with applications to randomized characterization, quantum metrology, quantum algorithms, and many-body physics.
Qing-Yue Zhang, Jun-Jie Chen, Zhou You et al.· 0 citations
We consider quantum devices restricted to local operations in 2D and subject to local stochastic noise below a constant threshold. We show that such circuits are computationally more powerful than AC0-circuits, i.e., noise-free, geometrically-unconstrained constant-depth classical circuits with unbounded fan-in AND, OR...
Libor Caha, Robert Koenig, Louis Paletta· 0 citations
A central question in the theory of quantum advantage is whether there are quantum advantage protocols with similar resource requirements as random circuit sampling that are also verifiable just from the classical outputs of the quantum computation. Here, we develop the idea of simulation secrets for verifiable advanta...
Markus Bläser, M. Gullans, Dominik Hangleiter et al.· 1 citation
Decoded quantum interferometry (DQI) is a polynomial-time quantum algorithm introduced by Jordan et al. (Nature 2025). For a natural optimization problem, known as optimal polynomial intersection (OPI), it achieves approximation guarantees in regimes where all known classical algorithms require exponential time. Beside...
It is well-known that every $n$-qubit unitary can be implemented by a $2^{O(n)}$-depth quantum circuit using single- and two-qubit gates. It has been open whether exponential depth is *necessary* for general unitaries, even when allowing an unlimited number of ancilla qubits. Here we show, perhaps surprisingly, that al...
Barak Nehoran, Joseph Slote, Henry S. Yuen· 2 citations· ⚡1
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.