This work introduces Visual Place Recognition Auditing, an independent post-retrieval verification framework that leverages Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to assess retrieved matches by reasoning jointly over query and candidate images, and performs instance-level verification without requiring architecture-specific confidence measures, dataset-dependent thresholds, or prior knowledge of the deployment environment.
Abstract
Visual place recognition (VPR) is a key enabler of accurate localization and long-term autonomous navigation in robotics applications, such as loop closure detection for simultaneous localisation and mapping (SLAM). However, real-world VPR deployment relies on selecting an image matching threshold that balances precision and recall. These thresholds are typically tuned using labeled validation data and fixed during deployment, making them unreliable under environmental changes where ground truth is unavailable. This is particularly problematic in safety-critical robotics, where accepting a false loop closure can corrupt the estimated trajectory and map. In this work, we introduce Visual Place Recognition Auditing, an independent post-retrieval verification framework that leverages Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to assess retrieved matches by reasoning jointly over query and candidate images. Unlike conventional verification methods, our approach performs instance-level verification without requiring architecture-specific confidence measures, dataset-dependent thresholds, or prior knowledge of the deployment environment. We evaluate our method on six benchmark datasets using five state-of-the-art VPR methods and four VLMs. Results show that VLM-based auditing improves recall@1 by 13.6% on average as compared to state-of-the-art methods while reducing false acceptance rates to 12%, maintaining precision above 95% and coverage above 75%.
Vision-language models (VLMs) increasingly rely on point coordinates as a compact and executable interface for visual grounding in GUI interaction, robotic manipulation, and interactive visual systems. However, learning reliable pointing behavior remains difficult because the supervision space is inherently non-unique:...
Jing-Yang Su, Pu Cao, Xiu-Ze Jin et al.· 0 citations
This work instantiates a complementary model-robot interface: the VLM compares controller-constructed alternatives, while geometry, thresholds, action magnitude, and execution remain on the physical side in C2Nav, a training-free framework with three coordinated faculties.
This VLM and VLA robustness validation shows that robustness is mostly dependent on the perturbation type, rather than the model, and that VLMs are more robust to large camera rotations than VLAs, and that robustness depends more on model family than on model size.
Bogdan Aron, Christopher Brix, Benedikt Brückner et al.· 0 citations
VeriFuse assigns the VLM a clear and constrained role in cooperative perception: semantic reasoning resolves ambiguity among cross-agent hypotheses, while deterministic constraints determine the final 3D geometry.
Hong-Yi Lin, Yi-Yao Liu, Qi Kang et al.· 0 citations
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) operate in complex environments where failures are consequential. Sophisticated machine learning models for perception and planning are key to overcoming at least part of that complexity, but their black-box nature complicates validation and verification (V&V). The recent integration of Vision...
Tianwen Yu, Lu Feng, Sebastian G. Elbaum· 0 citations
FOCUS is presented, an uncertainty-aware framework for object-level change detection and map maintenance that fuses geometric likelihood with appearance likelihood rendered from a 3D Gaussian map and transfers to real-world data without manual parameter retuning.
Can Xu, Ming-Feng Yuan, Mahan Mohammadi et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.