VeraRAN is introduced, which checks plans before actuation by modeling request, delivery, acceptance, application, completion, and observation for each action while exploring plausible delays and event orders, and MI-POR prunes independent interleavings using RAN lifecycle and resource footprints.
Abstract
Agentic RAN controllers combine mobility, energy, and resource actions across independently implemented interfaces. Even when each command is valid and the target state is safe, asynchronous actuation can drive the network through unsafe intermediate states. In a frozen study of a 35B planner, 28.8% of locally valid plans remained asynchronously unsafe. We introduce VeraRAN, which checks plans before actuation by modeling request, delivery, acceptance, application, completion, and observation for each action while exploring plausible delays and event orders. When VeraRAN finds a counterexample, VeraSync inserts versioned event barriers and rechecks the repaired plan for safety and completion. MI-POR prunes independent interleavings using RAN lifecycle and resource footprints. In a post-freeze stratified confirmation within the declared repair domain, VeraSync re-certified every confirmation plan while leaving 87% of action pairs unordered. MI-POR matched exact search in a property-stratified audit and reduced explored states by 94.6-95.0% on 20-40-action plans. Native ns-O-RAN replay and an independent live E2 audit showed why distinguishing these events matters: acceptance may precede the authoritative state transition, so dependent actions must wait for direct APPLY evidence or a contract-backed completion event causally downstream of APPLY.
P LAN F ENCE is introduced, a dependency-scoped action-validation protocol for distributed LLM-agent teams that avoids repeated update-path coordination as churn grows and avoids validating unrelated state as the shared keyspace grows.
Evan Chen, Shi-Qiang Wang, Christopher G. Brinton· 1 citation
These results demonstrate DCCs as a reusable semantic foundation for agent autonomy across heterogeneous devices, unifying capability-based planning, evidence-grounded execution, and authorized recovery within one architecture.
Xue-Chun Li, Jia-Xin Liang, Jie Li et al.· 0 citations
BSC-R is introduced, a deterministic effect-boundary mechanism that binds a single-use commit authorization to the exact action and to a semantic projection of the authorization state that justified it.
A reconstruction-stable authorization (ReSA) is formulated over representation transitions, sink dependencies, consumed versions, and grant scope and implemented in APAS-Finder and freeze predictions before an independent sink oracle observes execution.
Jun-Chi Zhu, Zhen-Guang Liu, Shao-Jing Fan et al.· 0 citations
LIMBO, a deterministic sandbox of six services with realistic contracts and twelve fault modes injected at the service boundary and twelve fault modes injected at the service boundary, is introduced, proving that no verification-only policy is exactly-once under late commits without a bound on in-flight time.
Jia-Peng Li· 2 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.