Skip to content
Preprint

Zero-Trust Federated Learning for Connected Aftermarket Devices

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 29 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

An edge-learning architecture that combines device-level access control, privacy-preserving federated learning, and adversarial validation for over-the-air update and predictive maintenance decisions is developed.

Abstract

Connected aftermarket devices extend vehicle diagnostics, repair workflows, and over-the-air software maintenance beyond original equipment manufacturer boundaries, yet their heterogeneous ownership and long service life complicate conventional perimeter security. This paper develops Zero Trust Federated Learning for Connected Aftermarket Devices (ZT FL CADE), an edge-learning architecture that combines device-level access control, privacy-preserving federated learning, and adversarial validation for over-the-air update and predictive maintenance decisions. The evaluation uses a single synthetic dataset of 144,000 telemetry windows from 240 devices, 12 vendor domains, and 180 days of operation. Features include bus entropy, update latency, attestation age, signature retries, environmental signals, fault-code rates, packet loss, drift, mileage, and trust score, with targets for maintenance risk, update intrusion, and access action. ZT FL CADE trains local temporal models, aggregates privacy-bounded updates, scores each device against behavioral and update integrity evidence, and routes update requests to allow, challenge, or quarantine actions. Synthetic experiments improve maintenance risk F1 from 0.837 for Fed Avg to 0.883, improve intrusion F1 from 0.856 to 0.897, and preserve 0.842 intrusion recall when 20 percent of selected clients are adversarial. Mean access-decision latency remains 44 MS, below the 100 MS operational budget used in the simulation. The results do not establish field validation, but they indicate that zero-trust policy enforcement and federated learning can be evaluated jointly rather than as separate aftermarket security controls. Index Terms Zero trust architecture, federated learning, connected aftermarket devices, over-the-air updates, adversarial machine learning, edge artificial intelligence, predictive maintenance, automotive cybersecurity

View source

Similar papers

Blockchain-enabled federated learning with spatio-temporal trust and self-evolving governance for IoV intrusion detection

The IoV BCFL+ framework promises scalability linked with self-evolution in security architecture, taking a big step in IoV intrusion detection state and strongly paving way for future intelligent transportation security systems.

K. Charan, R. Vishnukumar · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Federated Machine Learning for Privacy-Preserving Cyberattack Detection Across Distributed Edge and Telecommunications Network Environments

A hierarchical federated machine-learning framework for privacy-preserving detection of coordinated attacks across heterogeneous telecommunications edge environments and provides a scalable security architecture for converting distributed network observations into shared cyber-threat intelligence while retaining operat...

Jia-Chen Yin · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning: Gradient-Based Client Identity Inference and Defenses for Inertial Sensing in Vehicular Edge Networks

As vehicular networks move toward 5G/6G edge intelligence, federated learning (FL) is widely promoted as a privacy-preserving way for vehicles and infrastructure to train shared models without exposing raw sensor data. Yet the updates clients transmit still leak enough information to identify who sent them, which threa...

Ali Akarma, Toqeer Ali Syed, Muhammad Khan et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

AP3-FedFleet: Asynchronous Federated Learning With Dynamic Layer-Wise Privacy Protection for Heterogeneous IoT Systems

Federated learning (FL) enables multiple devices to collaboratively train machine learning models without sharing raw data, making it well-suited for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. However, this approach is not fully secure, as the exchanged gradients can still leak sensitive information. Attacks such as Deep L...

Mounika Mellamarthi, Ammar Summaq, Mukkara Prasanna Kumar et al. · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning with Differential Privacy: Methods, Threats, and Future Directions

Federated Learning (FL) and Differential Privacy (DP) have become fundamental techniques for building privacy-preserving and decentralized machine learning systems. FL supports collaborative training of models over distributed devices and organizations without exchanging raw data and DP enhances privacy guarantees by a...

Prabushankar K. C., B. Buvaneswari, P. Rajamani et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

A Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning Framework for Intrusion Detection in Healthcare IoT Environments

PPFL-IDS combines federated model aggregation with differential privacy noise injection and secure aggregation protocols to train a lightweight gradient-boosted ensemble IDS without exposing local device data, demonstrating that strong privacy guarantees and high detection accuracy can be achieved simultaneously in fed...

Nutan Gusain, J. Alzubi · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.