Skip to content
Conference Open access

The Quality of Research Methods in Studies Quantifying the Association Between Cancer Diagnosis to Treatment Interval and Overall Survival

Aug 2026 · Inquiry@Queen's Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 0 citations

TL;DR

A systematic review of observational studies published from 2020 onward that examine the association between DTI and OS in seven cancers with global relevance to provide a comprehensive assessment of methodological validity and consistency in recent studies investigating the association between cancer DTI and OS.

Abstract

Background and Objective: Studies examining the association between cancer diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) and overall survival (OS) are important to help inform clinical practice guidelines. Recent international consensus-based recommendations defined best practices for this area of research and raised concerns about the poor validity and inconsistent methodologies in the available literature. Our objective is to systematically assess the quality of studies investigating the association between DTI and OS using consensus-based methodological recommendations. Methods: We are conducting a systematic review of observational studies published from 2020 onward that examine the association between DTI and OS in seven cancers with global relevance: bladder, breast, colon, rectal, lung, cervical, and head and neck cancers. We developed thorough search strategies to search Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. Two rounds of screening will be performed in tandem using Covidence following predefined exclusion criteria and reliability procedures. Data extraction will be performed using Covidence with considerations for reliability and reconciliation. Methodological components will be evaluated against international consensus-based recommendations across domains including variable definition and measurement, cohort creation, confounder control, bias management, analytic techniques, and responsible data interpretation. Findings will be synthesized and presented using descriptive statistics.  Anticipated Applications: This review will provide a comprehensive assessment of methodological validity and consistency in recent studies investigating the association between cancer DTI and OS. The findings will highlight areas for improvement and support wider adoption of the consensus-based recommendations to strengthen future research in this area (Jalink et al., 2025). References: Jalink M, King WD, Anderson BO, et al. Recommendations for studying the association of the cancer diagnosis to treatment interval with overall survival: a modified Delphi process. Br J Cancer. 2025;133:1526-1534. doi:10.1038/s41416-025-03158-3.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults - A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Global Trends and Perspectives

Background: The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as CRC diagnosed in individuals under age 50, is rising globally. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes global epidemiological trends, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of EOCRC. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020...

Md Shakhawate Hossain, Md Ghulam Yusuf, Mohammad Shoaib Chowdhury et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Core Outcome Set Measures Are Underreported in Breast Cancer Randomized Clinical Trials: A Cross-Sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard in oncology for the discovery of new therapeutic approaches and treatment management. As medicine takes a more patient-centered approach, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become imperative, particularly in clinical trials. The need for standard...

A. Douglas, Ty Moore, Griffin K. Hughes et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Prognostic factors influencing recurrence in patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Endometrial cancer (EC) ranks as the 6th most common cancer among women worldwide. Despite early detection often yielding favorable outcomes, approximately 13% of early-stage EC patients still experience recurrence. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors for EC recurrence. METHODS A systematic revie...

Fitriyadi Kusuma, K. A. Suryoadji, Vira Nur Arifa et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Few prostate cancer guidelines are of high methodologic quality and therefore trustworthy.

INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men worldwide, underscoring the importance of high-quality, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in this field. We conducted this study to evaluate the methodologic quality of prostate cancer CPGs. METHODS Following a prespecified protocol...

F. Tondroanamag, D. González-Padilla, C. Bakker et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Reporting of external validation studies needs improvement: a systematic review of reporting in oncology prediction model studies.

External validation studies were substantially less common than prediction model development studies and reporting of key methodological and performance details were frequently incomplete despite the availability of TRIPOD, suggesting it may sometimes be treated as a procedural step rather than a study designed to eval...

Rebecca Whittle, A. Legha, Biruk Tsegaye et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.