DREAM is presented, a framework that generates fine-tuning data for a pretrained VLA from a captured workspace and a language instruction, without requiring a task-specific human demonstration, and whether it can serve as a scalable data-collection system for the deployment workspace.
Abstract
Vision-language-action (VLA) models have made strong progress in language-conditioned robot manipulation, but improving their performance in a new workspace still often requires action-labeled data from that environment. Collecting such data by human teleoperation is costly, especially when each workspace, object arrangement, or task may require new demonstrations. We present DREAM, a framework that generates fine-tuning data for a pretrained VLA from a captured workspace and a language instruction, without requiring a task-specific human demonstration. DREAM reconstructs the workspace, automatically translates the instruction into symbolic task goals and success criteria using a large language model, and uses task-and-motion planning to generate feasible robot trajectories. The planned trajectories are augmented across randomized object configurations, verified by the generated success criteria, and rendered into image-action examples for VLA fine-tuning. Through real-robot experiments on language-conditioned manipulation tasks, we study whether DREAM can serve as a scalable data-collection system for the deployment workspace by examining whether fine-tuning on its automatically generated data improves success over direct deployment and how its data-collection cost compares with human teleoperation when adapting a VLA to a new workspace.
Collecting high-quality robot data remains a fundamental challenge for training robot foundation models. Task and motion planning (TAMP) offers a scalable way to generate demonstrations, but our experiments show that raw TAMP trajectories provide surprisingly little benefit when used to fine-tune pretrained vision-lang...
Samrat Sahoo, Yi-Xuan Huang, Tom Silver· 1 citation· ⚡1
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have become a prominent paradigm for mapping multimodal inputs, including semantic instructions, visual observations of the scene, and proprioceptive observations, to robot actions. Most state-of-the-art models predict actions in the end-effector pose space as sequences of action chu...
Mathilde Kappel, Clémence Grislain, Mohamed Chetouani et al.· 0 citations
Vision--language--action (VLA) models provide strong priors for robotic manipulation but are typically deployed as frozen policies, unable to improve from their own failures. Real-world reinforcement learning (RL) offers a path to continued improvement, yet manual environment resets and task-success supervision hinder...
Yuan Fang, Ze-Chu Li, Hao-Lei Tong et al.· 0 citations
Reinforcement learning fine-tuning on top of large, pretrained Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models offers promise for highly reliable robot deployment. However, because of their scale, modern VLA models suffer from high inference latency, so the observation used to select an action is often stale by execution time, cre...
Perry Dong, Kuo-Han Hung, D. Sadigh et al.· 0 citations
TemporalFlow-VLA provides a compact, physically grounded interface for exploiting ordered execution history without explicit motion estimation or geometric processing at deployment, and shows its clearest advantage over prior methods on longer-horizon, multi-stage manipulation.
Jia-Rui Yang, Ye-Hao Lu, Yu-Ning Su et al.· 1 citation
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies commonly run Vision-Language Model (VLM) backbones with billions of parameters at every policy inference, which costs latency and energy. We revisit a decoupled alternative for multi-task manipulation: separate vision and language encoders whose representations condition a compact...
Xia-Tao Sun, Chen Liang, Zi-Yao Zeng et al.· 2 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.