Skip to content

Imputation-free transformer learning enables robust Alzheimer’s disease prediction and calibrated uncertainty quantification across heterogeneous clinical cohorts

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · 0 citations
Medicine Computer Science Biology

TL;DR

NITROGEN is proposed, an imputation-free transformer that jointly models within-patient feature dependencies and between-patient relational structure through masked and intersample attention, enabling robust multimodal learning directly from partially observed records, and shows robust probability calibration and uncertainty quantification advantages over tree-based ensemble methods.

Abstract

Accurate diagnostic classification and disease-severity prediction for Alzheimer’s disease are hampered by the pervasive incompleteness and heterogeneity of real-world clinical data. Left unaddressed, these barriers prevent reliable disease modelling and hinder effective clinical evaluation. Conventional imputation strategies introduce systematic bias, distort inter-feature relationships, and yield overconfident predictions, limitations that are especially consequential in diagnostic settings. Here, we propose NITROGEN‖, an imputation-free transformer that jointly models within-patient feature dependencies and between-patient relational structure through masked and intersample attention, enabling robust multimodal learning directly from partially observed records. We trained NITROGEN on the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; N=7858 scans), and evaluated it, without further retraining, on two independent cohorts: the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS-3; N=2675 scans) and the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL; N=1286 scans) study. Across all cohorts and various tasks including binary and multi-class diagnostic classification as well as continuous cognitive score prediction, NITROGEN showed robust probability calibration and uncertainty quantification advantages over tree-based ensemble methods, while maintaining competitive discriminative and continuous cognitive score prediction performance. Moreover, cross-cohort and cross-method analyses identified cortical thickness in the temporal pole, age, and APOE genotype as important, though not individually sufficient, features for robust AD status classification. To address prediction reliability under incomplete data, we further introduced a modality-aware uncertainty adjustment that augments predictive uncertainty in proportion to the estimated importance of absent modalities, enabling models to express calibrated confidence when critical diagnostic information is unavailable. Taken together, our results show that imputation-free attention learning preserved meaningful discrimination under external cohort shift, while revealing the expected performance degradation on more distributionally different cohorts. These findings further demonstrate that evaluating machine learning models for neurological disease along dimensions of calibration, interpretability, and cross-cohort reliability—not predictive accuracy alone—is essential for better clinical deployment. Code to reproduce our experiments is publicly available at https://github.com/cschneuw/nitrogen.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Quantifying Uncertainty in Alzheimer's Disease Progression Modelling: A Variational Disease Progression Score Framework

Predicting the course of Alzheimer's disease for individual patients remains a major challenge due to the heterogeneity of disease expression and the sparsity of longitudinal data. We introduce a variational Disease Progression Score (DPS) framework that maps multimodal biomarker dynamics (Cerebrospinal fluid, neuroima...

T. Ngamsaowaros, I. Bodala, S. Michopoulou et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Diagnostic Labels and Measurement Timing Drive Systematic Inconsistency in ADNI Neuroimaging Data

The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is widely used to train machine learning models for Alzheimer’s disease, yet whether it provides consistent ground truth for predictive modeling has not been systematically tested. In this paper, we showed that ADNI contains three interacting sources of bias with d...

Palmer J. Smith, Harry W. Richardson, Katie A. Robertson et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Multi-dimensional attention framework for personalised Alzheimer's disease progression prediction across sporadic and genetic risk cohorts

A multi-dimensional attention framework that simultaneously captures both temporal dynamics and biomarker importance to predict disease progression across three fundamentally different populations could enable precision medicine approaches for data-limited cohorts across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum.

Zhi-Yuan Song, Si-Yang Song, Isabel C. H. Clare et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Interpretable multimodal learning for integrating neuroimaging and genetic data in Alzheimer’s disease

R-GenIMA, an interpretable multimodal large language model that pairs a region-of-interest vision transformer with genetic prompting to jointly analyze structural MRI and single nucleotide polymorphisms, shows that interpretable multimodal AI can integrate imaging and genetics to reveal disease mechanisms.

Kun Zhao, Si-Yuan Dai, Ying-Ying Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Maria-X: A Multimodal Transformer Aware of Missing Data for Reliable Diagnosis and Prognosis of Alzheimer’s Disease

An imputation approach originally validated under MCAR is extended to instead operate under the more realistic Missing At Random (MAR) mechanism, which proves robust under MAR conditions, with particularly strong performance in cases where missingness is driven by observed variables a property that points toward practi...

Lakshmiprasannakumar Vemavarapu, Chandra Sekhar Sanaboina · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.