Skip to content
Open access

Long-Term Effectiveness of Intensive Blood Pressure Management Led by Nonphysician Community Healthcare Providers on Cardiovascular Events: 7-Year Follow-Up of a Cluster Randomized Trial.

Aug 2026 · Circulation · 1 citation · 22 references
Medicine

TL;DR

A nonphysician community healthcare provider-led program with the intensive target of <130/80 mm Hg reduced CVD risk during the 4-year active intervention period and posttrial effects in CVD risk reduction were generally consistent across subgroups defined by baseline age, sex, education, and antihypertensive medication use.

Abstract

Background

Hypertension is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) worldwide. Implementation-based blood pressure (BP) control programs improve BP control and reduce CVD risk, but whether their benefits persist after withdrawal of trial-supported intervention components remains uncertain, especially when intensive BP control is targeted. In CRHCP (China Rural Hypertension Control Project), a nonphysician community healthcare provider (NPCHP)-led program with the intensive target of <130/80 mm Hg reduced CVD risk during the 4-year active intervention period. We extended follow-up for an additional 3 years to assess BP control and CVD outcomes over the 7-year overall period and during the 3-year posttrial period.

Methods

CRHCP was a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in rural China. Eligible participants were ≥40 years of age with BP ≥140/90 mm Hg or ≥130/80 mm Hg if at high CVD risk or receiving antihypertensive treatment. We randomly assigned 326 villages 1:1 to NPCHP-led intensive BP control or usual care. During the 4-year intervention, trained NPCHPs initiated and titrated antihypertensive medications using a standardized protocol under primary care physician supervision and provided coaching on home BP monitoring, lifestyle modification, and medication adherence. The program also provided discounted or free antihypertensive medications, additional training, and performance incentives. Participants in the usual care group received local standard BP management throughout. During the 3-year posttrial period from years 4 to 7, intervention participants continued care with their original NPCHPs, with physician and hypertension specialist consultation available; discounted or free medications, additional training, and performance incentives were discontinued. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and CVD death. Treatment effects were evaluated separately over the 7-year overall and 3-year posttrial periods with prespecified subgroup analyses.

Results

Between May 8 and November 28, 2018, 33 995 participants were enrolled; 31 334 entered the posttrial follow-up. At the end of the 7-year overall period, BP was 138.8/80.7 mm Hg in the intervention group versus 152.3/86.1 mm Hg in the usual care group (between-group difference, -13.5/-5.4 mm Hg; P<0.0001 for both systolic and diastolic BPs); percentage of the participants with BP <130/80 mm Hg was 33.9% versus 10.5% (P<0.0001). During the 7-year overall period, the rate of composite CVD events was 2.4% versus 3.0% per person-year in the intervention and usual care groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.72-0.81]; P<0.0001). During the 3-year posttrial period, the corresponding rates were 3.4% versus 4.2% per person-year (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.73-0.85]; P<0.0001). Posttrial effects in CVD risk reduction were generally consistent across subgroups defined by baseline age, sex, education, and antihypertensive medication use. Over the 7-year overall period, the intervention group had higher risks of hypotension (risk ratio, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.39-1.79]) and mild hypokalemia (risk ratio, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.23-1.56]; P<0.001 for both).

Conclusions

Multicomponent BP management strategy with a BP target <130/80 mm Hg led by NPCHPs achieved sustained BP control and reduced CVD risk during both the 7-year overall and 3-year posttrial periods. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03527719.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Effectiveness of a Pharmacist-Led Educational and Follow-Up Intervention on Blood Pressure Control Among Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study

Background: Effective blood pressure (BP) control matters for secondary prevention and it is one big piece of the cardiovascular (CV) morbidity story, alongside mortality inside the United States, especially for people with coronary artery disease (CAD). Interventions done by pharmacists might be beneficial to cardiova...

Danish Azad · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Effectiveness and safety of a New Standardised TrEatment Protocol based on initial/early therapy with single-pill combinations of blood pressure-lowering drugs for improving blood pressure control (NewSTeP): Rationale, design of a randomized clinical trial and baseline characteristics of the trial p

Background Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Despite availability of blood pressure (BP)-lowering therapies, BP control rates remain suboptimal. Reluctance to initiate treatment with combination therapy and delayed treatment intensification contribute to poor control....

R. Dhurjati, R. Pant, A. Kumar et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Association of blood-pressure time-in-therapeutic range with morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients: a retrospective cohort study in the community setting

Good blood pressure control during the first year after diagnosis, defined using TTR and a BP target of < 140/90 mmHg, was associated with lower risks of mortality and K/CV events among patients diagnosed before age 75 years and no significant associations were observed at ≥ 75 years.

Tamara Alonso-Safont, E. Polentinos-Castro, Isabel del-Cura-González et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

CONTROL-IHD Study: 24-h BP Control with Metoprolol-Telmisartan FDC in Hypertension and Stable Ischemic Disease.

The reductions observed during the early post-application and late dosing-interval periods suggest sustained BP lowering over 24 h, and may suggest sustained BP lowering over 24 h in patients with hypertension and stable IHD.

Kamal Sharma, Gaurav Chhaya, M. Chopda et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Intensive blood-pressure control for the prevention of major cardiovascular events in stroke patients: rationale and design of the OPTIMAL-STROKE trial

Abstract Background In high cardiovascular risk populations without prior stroke, intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering confers greater reductions in cardiovascular events than standard targets. However, optimal BP targets in patients with ischaemic stroke (IS) or TIA remain uncertain. The primary objective of the OPT...

G. Silva, M. J. Machline-Carrion, K. Santo et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Improving Blood Pressure Control Post Emergency Department Visit Through Structured Patient Education and Telephone Follow-up: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Background: Uncontrolled hypertension frequently persists after emergency department (ED) discharge because of limited education, poor adherence, and fragmented follow-up. This quality improvement initiative evaluated whether structured discharge education plus telephone follow-up could improve blood pressure (BP) and...

M. Aqeel, M. Hashmi, U. Shoaib et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.