Skip to content
Review Open access

Agile Software Development Challenges: Identification, Validation, and Prioritization Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Aug 2026 · Information · 0 citations · 180 references

TL;DR

This study identifies Inadequate Architecture, Lack of Standardized Framework, Communication and Coordination, Poor Requirement Verification, and Minimum Documentation as the most significant challenges in Agile development.

Abstract

Context: The Agile methodology has been prevalent in the software industry for more than two decades, marking a shift from plan-driven to market-driven approaches and introducing various challenges. While the literature identifies numerous challenges in Agile development, little attention has been given to their ranking and prioritization, which are critical for effective project management and decision making. This study fills this gap by combining empirical evidence from the literature and practitioners. Objectives: This study aims to identify and hierarchically prioritize the most recent challenges faced by Agile practitioners during product development. To achieve this, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted using 115 published studies between 2010 and 2025 followed by empirical data collection from 30 Agile experts through semi-structured interviews conducted with practitioners from Agile companies and an online survey. This study applies Cumulative Voting (100-Dollar Test) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques to rank and prioritize these challenges. Results: The SLR identifies several recurring Agile challenges; however, limited research has focused on their ranking and prioritization. The present study reveals new challenges, such as user interface complexities, lack of pre-development and pre-operational cost information, and lack of cost scalability at the module and feature levels. The current study identifies Inadequate Architecture (22%), Lack of Standardized Framework (18%), Communication and Coordination (16%), Poor Requirement Verification (13%), and Minimum Documentation (8%) as the most significant challenges. Conclusions: This study provides valuable insight for Agile practitioners and organizations, enabling more informed project planning, resource allocation, and strategic decision making. By focusing on the most critical challenges, teams can enhance software quality, streamline processes, and improve overall productivity in Agile environments.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access 2026

Synthesizing Critical Success Factors in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review and Theoretical Framework

Context: Despite the popularity of Agile software development, achieving consistent project success remains challenging. Furthermore, identifying what contributes to project success is inconsistent across studies. In addition measuring success is incoherent, and existing SLR’s are not systematic, explicit, and comprehe...

Ridewaan Hanslo, M. Tanner · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

An Essence-Based Software Development Methodology to Support a Hybrid Waterfall-Agile in the Banking Domain: A Case Study at Bank XYZ

The results show that the proposed methodology improved work visibility through Kanban-based flow visualization, increased clarity and traceability of workflow and artefacts, and remained fully compatible with the existing stage-gate and regulatory controls.

Muhammad Ali Ihsan Fauzi, Eko K. Budiardjo, Heru Saputra · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Collaboration and Uncertainty Management in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Integrative Review and Literature-Based Positioning of CDM

The synthesis develops a collaborative learning loop linking stakeholder intent, uncertainty, early evidence, consequential decisions, and adaptation, which positions the Collaborative Development Method (CDM) as a literature-grounded configuration of established mechanisms rather than a validated replacement for exist...

Maha Makkass, Youness Laghouaouta, A. Anwar · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Agile Practices and Agility in Non-Software SMEs: A Systematic Literature Review

(1) Background: Research on non-software small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) uses agile to describe named management practices, related approaches such as Lean, and organizational capabilities. Conflating these constructs obscures what firms actually do. (2) Methods: We revisited a systematic search of Scopus and...

Agustín Olivares, Paul Leger, Natalia Araya Araya Plaza et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.