Skip to content

Systematic Experiment Tracking in Quantum Software: A Case Study of Reservoir Computing with Error Mitigation

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.24264 · 0 citations · 62 references
Physics Computer Science

TL;DR

This article explains the basic concept of experiment tracking and detail how, in essence, quantum computing sets demands on tracking practices, and presents a detailed quantum software development process and describes how experiments can be tracked throughout development.

Abstract

Quantum computers are more widely available than ever, making the field more accessible and widespread. Practitioners are coming from a wide range of domains, conducting experiments and research using quantum computing approaches across a variety of problems. The current literature suggests that developers follow certain methodologies in quantum software development, often with a matching set of tools provided. Yet with the novel paradigm, there are areas that remain unaddressed in practices and tools. In this article, we go into the details of experiment tracking in quantum software development. We explain the basic concept of experiment tracking and detail how, in essence, quantum computing sets demands on tracking practices. Given the experimental state of hardware and the constantly evolving software, quantum execution must be monitored, marginal gains aggregated for the best outcome, and error sources detected. In our case study, quantum reservoir computing for chaotic time series data prediction with error mitigation, we present a detailed quantum software development process and describe how experiments can be tracked throughout development. We then generalize this knowledge into the broader quantum development process.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

The effects of shot noise on the quantum computation of NMR spectra

Recent advances in the field of quantum computing hardware motivate the search for applications which demonstrate so-called quantum advantage. One promising use case that has been identified is the simulation of quantum many-body systems. The computational resources required for performing such a simulation on a classi...

Sebastian Walch, Keith R. Fratus, Jan-Michael Reiner et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Practical Error Suppression and Mitigation for Reliable Quantum Computing

This review examines how error mitigation techniques can be adapted to encoded and logical-qubit settings so that they can operate alongside quantum error correction to suppress residual logical errors and improve the accuracy of computation in the early fault-tolerant regime.

Han-Ze Li, Mengjie Yang, Xian-Quan Yan et al. · 3 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Quantum Error Mitigation: A Comprehensive Survey

This survey paper aims to synthesize the state-of-the-art in QEM, offer organized insights across approaches, and propose potential paths towards error-resilient quantum computing.

Ratun Rahman, Dinh C. Nguyen · 0 citations
Book Open access Oct 2026

Quantum Computing and Static Analysis: State of the Art and Research Opportunities

Due to its fast evolution, quantum computing is increasingly becoming a software problem, one that requires particular care because of the intrinsic peculiarities of quantum programs. Static analysis for quantum programs is still in its infancy. It has produced both principled semantic techniques and practical pattern-...

Greta Dolcetti, Giulio Zizzo, V. Arceri et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Quantum error mitigation from information dynamics

Overcoming experimental errors is a central challenge in quantum science. This challenge is particularly acute in large and complex quantum circuits, where quantum information spreads into exponentially many paths, foiling any direct attempt to understand errors'impact. In this work, we present a novel approach to unde...

Philippe Suchsland, T. Schuster, Manuel S. Rudolph et al. · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Evaluating Verified Autonomy in Quantum Engineering

QIQCBench is introduced, a benchmark of $49$ expert-authored tasks spanning multiple layers including calibration and control, error correction and compilation, sensing and networking, that reveals wide variation in verified performance across frontier agentic systems.

N. Guo, Chang-Hao Li, Si-Yu Cheng et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.