Aug 2026· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2· 0 citations· 42 references
TL;DR
FedSPA, a Subspace Projection Aggregation personalized differential private Federated learning framework, is proposed, which not only effectively guides the aggregation of client personalized differential privacy but also reduces communication overhead.
Abstract
Differential privacy (DP) mechanisms have been widely adopted in federated learning (FL) to enhance model security. However, existing approaches predominantly employ uniform privacy budgets, neglecting personalized requirements arising from heterogeneous user privacy preferences. Such uniform privacy configurations typically necessitate compliance with the most stringent budget, which not only leads to the wasteful underutilization of privacy budgets for certain clients but also compromises overall model utility. To address this limitation, we propose FedSPA, a Subspace Projection Aggregation personalized differential private Federated learning framework. The proposed method conducts singular value decomposition operations on noise-perturbed local models to extract singular value vectors as compact representations of both model structure and privacy noise. The server then clusters clients and identifies a consensus subspace for projecting models with varying noise levels, ultimately aggregating the global model through a residual-aware mechanism. This method not only effectively guides the aggregation of client personalized differential privacy but also reduces communication overhead. Extensive experiments demonstrate the model's effectiveness. Additionally, we provide theoretical proof of the privacy and convergence of FedSPA. Experimental results also showcase its superior performance over personalized DP-FL baselines.
Centralized Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training without sharing raw data. Differential privacy (DP) is widely used to protect sensitive information in FL; however, its behavior in decentralized environments remains poorly understood. This study empirically compares centralized FL and sequential...
AlsharifHasan Mohamad Aburbeian, M. Fernández-Veiga, A. Fernández-Vilas et al.· Future Internet· 0 citations
i-FedLoRA provides privacy guarantees, improves model accuracy by up to 3.8%, and expedites training by 1.37-2.23×, and facilitates heterogeneous LoRA aggregation that selectively prioritizes high-confidence knowledge to filter DP-induced noise, thereby achieving robust knowledge transfer.
Nan Yan, Yu-Qing Li, Xiong Wang et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
The concept of Federated Learning (FL) allows training models in a decentralized way without distributing raw data but, nonetheless, the gradients are vulnerable to privacy attacks that include gradient inversion, reconstruction, and membership inference. Differential Privacy (DP) is broadly used to address these risks...
Vajjakeshavulu Anusha, Ranjeeth Kumar M· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations
Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across multiple clients in a privacy-preserving manner. However, the employment of homomorphic encryption algorithms might lead to high computational cost while the application of differential privacy (DP) methods would sacrifice model performance. To establi...
Zhiqiang Chen, Yuchen Jiang, Ray Y. Zhong et al.· IEEE Transactions on Informa...· 0 citations
Federated learning (FL) trains a shared model across data holders that cannot pool their records, but deployments remain bounded by three coupled costs: uplink traffic from repeated model exchange, accuracy loss under statistically heterogeneous clients, and the information that updates still leak. These are usually at...
Harshavardhan Peddireddy, Sandeep Kumar Gadde, Prasad Bheemavarapu et al.· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations