Jun 2026· Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering· Vol 3, pp. 411 - 434· 1 citation· ⚡ 1 influential· 72 references
TL;DR
Experimental results demonstrate that MRSQLGen consistently outperforms state-of-the-art hallucination detection techniques, achieving higher precision and recall in detecting hallucinated SQL queries.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) can translate natural language (NL) into SQL, enabling non-experts to query databases via conversational interfaces. However, the generated SQL often contains intent-violating hallucinations—queries that are syntactically valid and executable, yet semantically misaligned with the user’s question. These failures are especially risky in real-world settings where users cannot verify the correctness. In this paper, we propose MRSQLGen, a framework for detecting intent-violating hallucinations, built on the metamorphic prompting paradigm. MRSQLGen rewrites the input prompt using task-specific transformation rules derived from a hallucination taxonomy, and validates the generated SQL by checking behavioral consistency across multiple executions. Each transformation is associated with a metamorphic relationship (MR) that defines the expected relation between results; discrepancies are aggregated through a majority-vote strategy to robustly flag hallucinations without ground-truth SQL. We evaluate MRSQLGen on two benchmarks (Spider and Bird) using five representative LLMs, including GPT-4o. Experimental results demonstrate that MRSQLGen consistently outperforms state-of-the-art hallucination detection techniques, achieving higher precision and recall in detecting hallucinated SQL queries.
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become foundational to next-generation Intelligent Information Systems, the bridge between natural language interfaces and structured database systems remains a critical bottleneck. While Text-to-SQL generation enables cooperative support for complex query formulation, ensuring the reliability of these generated queries at inference time is a central challenge. Conventional methods rely on coarse execution-based signals, which may limit their ability to capture the nuanced semantic alignment required for high-stakes database environments. In this work, we propose the use of Outcome Reward Models (ORMs) as a fine-grained, probabilistic feedback mechanism for test-time verification in Text-to-SQL tasks. We introduce GradeSQL, a framework for training task-specific ORMs that assign scalar utility scores to candidate SQL queries based on their semantic correctness and alignment with database schema. Our approach is evaluated on the BIRD and Spider benchmarks across multiple open-source LLM families. Experimental results demonstrate that ORM-based verification consistently outperforms traditional execution-based heuristics.
M. Tritto, G. Farano, Dario Di Palma et al.· Journal of Intelligence and...· 2 citations
A mixed-method, between-subjects user study comparing SQL-LLM, a GPT-4o-backed NLIDB, with Snowflake, a traditional SQL analytics platform finds that a verification burden survives the switch to natural language, so an NLIDB that hides the generated SQL would remove the very step users relied on to trust the answer.
Results show that SQL verification can be performed with a lightweight learned model while retaining feature-level evidence for inspecting and diagnosing its predictions, and feature attribution shows that the model relies on both semantic grounding and deterministic SQL-structure signals.
N. Shukla, Debasmita Panda, Srutanik Bhaduri et al.· 0 citations
Experimental results demonstrate that GPS-Relational constructs executable reference SQL across existing benchmark and complex generated queries, and that LLM execution accuracy degrades significantly as nesting depth increases up to 15 levels.
Goli Vaisi, P. Sheu· International Journal of Sem...· 0 citations