This work identifies the missing perspectives in SE4AI that currently stymie the successful deployment of AI-based systems for building operations and proposes a foundation for SE4AI in systems where failure has physical consequences - one the research agenda below will need to validate.
Abstract
Building operations are energy-inefficient. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven control systems promise benefits through optimization and predictive control, but deploying them in real buildings reveals a significant software engineering (SE) challenge. SE for AI practices assume digital environments where failures mean poor user experience. Buildings are different. A bad control decision wastes energy irreversibly, violates occupant comfort, or accelerates equipment wear. Although actual safety-critical failures are rare, as real building automation systems are inherently fault-tolerant, the physical and lasting nature of even minor failures fundamentally changes SE4AI requirements. Rooted in two interdisciplinary research projects in civil engineering and computer science that target the AI-driven optimization of building operations, we identify the missing perspectives in SE4AI that currently stymie the successful deployment of AI-based systems for building operations. We further share lessons learned and best practices, and discuss broader implications for engineering AI-driven building operations and cyber-physical systems more generally. Our work proposes a foundation for SE4AI in systems where failure has physical consequences - one the research agenda below will need to validate.
Seven engineering lessons for building AI systems that can operate predictably in enterprise environments cover deterministic control layers, validation boundaries, fallback strategies, observability, governance, production-safe deployment and the separation of probabilistic reasoning from deterministic execution.
Nirmal Kumar Jingar· Proceedings of the Raptors C...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming mechanical engineering (ME) practice, influencing activities that range from modeling and simulation to optimization, diagnostics, design, and technical communication. This article consolidates perspectives discussed at a dedicated round-table during the 28th ABCM In...
Americo Cunha, C. Nataraj, Luciano M. Lorenzo et al.· Journal of the Brazilian Soc...· 0 citations
Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) has become a mandated practice for Department of Defense acquisition programs, yet measured benefits remain elusive. The 2024 Defense Science Board found that less than one percent of published literature actually quantified MBSE outcomes, and flagship ground vehicle programs suc...
Michael Wagner, Nelson Santini, Anoop Balakrishnan· SAE technical paper series· 0 citations
A safety-oriented architectural framework that constrains how AI-enabled functions may be integrated into fail-operational by-wire systems and clarifies trade-offs among safety isolation, latency, and AI performance while preserving braking safety guarantees under continuous software evolution is proposed.
Soumyasudharsan Srinivasaraghavan· SAE technical paper series· 0 citations
It is argued that first-principles models (FPMs) remain essential for mission- and business-critical workflows in industrial automation, both in process design and operations and hybrid intelligence integrates mechanistic rigor with data-driven insights to deliver smarter design, safer operations, and more sustainable...
Hong Zhao, Shu Wang, Salvador I. Pérez-Uresti et al.· Industrial & Engineering...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.