Skip to content

[Artificial intelligence and healthcare: why is it difficult to move from the research phase to clinical practice?]

Sep 2026 · Recenti progressi in medicina · Vol 117 9, pp. 386-389 · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

To promote the safe and effective adoption of AI, stronger clinical evidence, structured training programs, and organizational models capable of supporting its implementation are required.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely regarded as one of the most promising innovations in healthcare, yet its adoption in routine clinical practice remains limited. Only a small proportion of AI applications developed in research settings are successfully integrated into healthcare delivery. Major barriers include poor interoperability with existing health information systems, complex regulatory requirements, limited scientific evidence, and the lack of clear clinical guidelines. Many AI tools have been evaluated through methodologically weak studies, often retrospective and lacking external validation, contributing to skepticism among healthcare professionals. Additional challenges involve healthcare professionals' education and training, algorithm transparency, and the ability of healthcare organizations to effectively incorporate these technologies into clinical workflows. To promote the safe and effective adoption of AI, stronger clinical evidence, structured training programs, and organizational models capable of supporting its implementation are required. Addressing these issues is essential to ensure that AI can deliver meaningful benefits for patients, healthcare professionals, and healthcare systems.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Clinical Decision Support in Pakistan: Implications for Primary Care Practice

This research proposes a framework for the sustainable integration of AI-CDSS into Pakistan's healthcare system, with a focus on scaling solutions to primary care environments such as Basic Health Units and rural health centers.

Huma Ahsan, F. Qazi, Amna Amir Jalal et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND PATIENT SAFETY: NEW PERSPECTIVES FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRACTICE

The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare processes has been reshaping pharmaceutical practice, particularly regarding patient safety and the prevention of adverse drug events. Given the expansion of clinical decision support tools, prescription screening systems, and predictive technologies, it...

Jéssica Ribeiro de Jesus Cordeiro · 0 citations

EDITORIAL TEAM

The study found that existing health and medical practice regulations remain oriented toward conventional healthcare relationships, and shared liability as a legal construction for distributing responsibility in AI-related healthcare malpractice is found to be inadequate.

Mochammad Tanzil Multazam, Hindarto, Yusuf Handyliem et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Cross-Sectional Need-Based Survey Among Healthcare Workers

Artificial intelligence (AI) based tools are rapidly entering clinical workflows. Understanding clinicians’ perceptions, the areas they expect to benefit from AI, desired competency levels, and ethical concerns are essential to plan training and safe implementation. A cross-sectional, anonymized Google sur...

Shivi Mishra, Rohit Singh, Nazia Nazir Zargar et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Can Artificial Intelligence Deliver in Real-World Health Systems? Early Insights From Augmented Intelligence in Medicine and Healthcare Initiative's 5 Funded Projects.

Early insights from AIM-HI-funded projects to inform real-world AI implementation highlight that implementation success depends on thoughtful integration into clinical environments, strong partnerships with stakeholders, as well as sustained evaluation and monitoring.

I. Ergas, H. Clancy, Thomas Wang et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Health artificial intelligence is here, but are we measuring what matters?

Limits in prevailing approaches to health AI evaluation are examined and a framework prioritizing outcomes-based, systems-level assessment aligned with healthcare delivery goals is proposed, contrasting a deontological focus on methodological standards with a consequentialist framework emphasizing real-world impact.

P. Payne, T. Kannampallil, Margaret Lozovatsky · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.