Under the study’s evaluation protocol, some AI-generated responses received higher ratings than the available reference answers, particularly when they contained accurate and relevant supporting detail, should not be interpreted as evidence that the models generally outperform qualified legal professionals.
Abstract
This comprehensive study introduces an advanced
A
rtificial Intelligence for
I
ndian
L
egal
Q
uestion
A
nswering or system tailored for the Indian legal context. leverages a variety of embedding and generative models, including the latest Large Language Models (LLMs), to address the unique challenges posed by the intricate and diverse nature of Indian legal texts, to enhance the accuracy and reliability of legal question responses. We conducted rigorous evaluations using both lexical and semantic metrics that are enriched by expert legal feedback to ensure relevance and accuracy. Our findings underscore the effectiveness of the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) paradigm in improving answer quality, particularly in complex legal domains. Additionally, we explored the performance on standardized tests such as the All India Bar Exam (AIBE), thus providing a robust benchmark for a practical application. Under the study’s evaluation protocol, some AI-generated responses received higher ratings than the available reference answers, particularly when they contained accurate and relevant supporting detail. This finding is specific to the evaluated dataset and rating criteria and should not be interpreted as evidence that the models generally outperform qualified legal professionals. We also discuss the challenges encountered, such as the need for precise context and the risks of model hallucination, and propose directions for future research to further refine AI capabilities in the legal field. This study aims to pave the way for enhanced legal decision-making support systems, making them more accessible and effective for legal professionals and the public alike.
The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) to Thai legal question answering (QA) presents significant opportunities but faces challenges, particularly with complex legal reasoning, accurate citation, and the high cost of advanced alignment techniques. This thesis addresses these issues through a two-fold contribut...
Trustworthy Legal AI requires systems that can answer legal questions while grounding their responses in authoritative sources. However, existing Vietnamese legal benchmarks provide limited coverage of real-world legal consultations. We introduce \textbf{ViLegalExpert}, a large-scale benchmark constructed from authenti...
Dat Tien Nguyen, Nghia Hieu Nguyen, A. Nguyen et al.· 0 citations
This study presents an empirical comparative evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system performance for legal information retrieval and question answering in the context of Thai law. The main objective of this research is to analyze, evaluate, and compare the functional effectiveness of two prominent ope...
A comparative benchmarking study evaluating the regulatory comprehension of four open-source large language models, TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat, Gemma-2B-Instruct, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3, contributes an empirical characterization of small and medium language model regulatory comprehension and a reu...
Eleni Tsalera, Gerasimos K. Pagiatakis, Andreas E. Papadakis· Future Internet· 0 citations
This research paper proposes a Retrieval Augmented Generation framework that is specific to the legal field in order to assist interactive retrieval and reason about judgments from the Supreme Court of India and demonstrates strong performance on metrics including contextual recall and answer relevancy.
Sayed Ayaan Ahmed Sha, Sangeetha Sivanesan, A. Madasamy et al.· 0 citations