Aug 2026· International Journal of Language and Literary Studies· Vol 8, pp. 50-68· 0 citations· 57 references
TL;DR
Examination of undergraduate students' perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as Grammarly, ChatGPT, and MS Copilot as feedback tools for their academic writing revealed that students held positive perspectives of AI as a feedback tool on their writing performance, learning and reflection, and affective impact.
Abstract
With the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence technologies in higher education, understanding students' attitudes toward these tools is essential for shaping effective academic practices. By grounding the investigation of AI-based feedback within socio-cognitive and self-regulated learning theories, this study examined undergraduate students' perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as Grammarly, ChatGPT, and MS Copilot as feedback tools for their academic writing. The study adopted a quantitative, cross-sectional survey design to capture students' perceptions. The sample consisted of 100 undergraduate students in the College of Medicine at Taif University. Data were collected using an adapted structured questionnaire employing a five-point Likert scale spanning from 'strongly disagree' (1) to 'strongly agree' (5). Data were analyzed using SPSS (v. 26) to ensure the validity and reliability of the questionnaire, and to perform descriptive statistical tests. The findings revealed that students held positive perspectives of AI as a feedback tool on their writing performance, learning and reflection, and affective impact. Furthermore, students reflected a high level of trust in the quality and credibility of AI-generated feedback for supporting academic writing tasks. The study recommended integrating AI literacy into writing curricula, establishing institutional guidelines for responsible AI use, and encouraging balanced reliance on AI tools with the teachers' guidance.
The findings revealed that undergraduate students had a positive attitude towards the use of Artificial Intelligence in education and a statistically significant difference was found between Arts and Science students with Science students demonstrating a more positive attitude than Arts students.
Abinash Neog· International Journal For Mu...· 0 citations
The findings reveal that EFL students demonstrate high familiarity with AI applications, especially for language learning, doing tasks, and perceive AI as a supportive learning assistant that enhances efficiency, autonomy, and confidence.
Suratman Dahlan, A. Usman, Awaludin Rizal et al.· Journal of Language Teaching...· 1 citation
The increasing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) writing tools has changed the way English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students seek feedback on their academic writing, particularly during the demanding process of preparing a research proposal or thesis. This study aims to explore how final-semester EFL students perc...
Saudah Saudah, Taufik Suadiyatno, Imansyah Imansyah· Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra· 0 citations
Positive student acceptance alongside persistent technical and feedback-related challenges are indicated, highlighting the importance of AI literacy, responsible use and institutional support.
M. Praveen, C. Anwaya, T. Vineethan· Journal of global research i...· 0 citations
It is suggested that AI technologies have considerable potential to enrich higher education; however, their successful implementation requires careful attention to ethical, technological, and pedagogical considerations to ensure that educational benefits are achieved while minimizing associated risks.
H. U. C. P. Hewawasam, D. Saparamadu· Sabaragamuwa University Jour...· 0 citations
The rapid development of the concept of artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly encouraged its integration into higher education. Choices regarding the adoption of AI should consider also the perspectives of students, as primary beneficiaries of academic training. This study reports the findings of a survey based...
V. Zichil, Venera-Mihaela Cojocariu, Cristina Cîrtiță-Buzoianu· Revista Romaneasca pentru Ed...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.