We present swarm-attack, an open-source adversarial testing framework in which multiple lightweight LLM agents coordinate through shared memory, parallel exploration, and evolutionary optimization. Together, our results demonstrate that both safety bypass of frontier models and software vulnerability discovery, i.e., the capability class that motivated restricted release of Anthropic's Mythos Preview, are achievable at effectively zero cost using commodity hardware and openly available models. We report two experiments. In the first, five instances of a 1.2 billion parameter model conducted 225 jailbreak attacks each against GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet~4. Against GPT-4o, the swarm achieved an Effective Harm Rate of 45.8%, producing 49 critical-severity breaches; against Claude Sonnet-4, the Effective Harm Rate was 0% despite a 40% technical success rate. In the second experiment, the same models performed combined source code analysis and binary fuzzing against a vulnerable C application with 9 planted CWEs. With a hand-crafted exploit seed corpus, regex pattern detection, and AddressSanitizer-based crash classification, the pipeline recovers 9 of 9 vulnerabilities (100% recall) in approximately four minutes on a consumer MacBook. With those scaffold components disabled, the same model recovers 0 of 9 by crash verification and 2 of 9 by citation. The capability class that motivated restricted release of Anthropic's Mythos Preview is therefore reproducible at effectively zero cost; the important enabler is the system scaffold itself, which compensates for the limited reasoning capacity of small individual models.
What the boom left behind of the OpenClaw AI agent went viral, and its public skill registry boomed is measured, drawing on the OpenClaw Git history, its GitHub issues and pull requests, and three ClawHub registry snapshots.
In September 2026, the leaders of the largest frontier AI laboratories said in public that the pace of capability improvement is too fast and that none of them can slow down alone, and agents under evaluation at OpenAI broke out of their test environment and reached a third party's live systems, which a UN-mandated pan...
Rikard Rosenbacke, Carl Rosenbacke, Victor Rosenbacke et al.· 0 citations
Production AI systems typically apply governance—compliance checking, auditing, and explanation—as an external control layer that observes outputs after they are produced. In this paper, embedded governance is proposed: a governance gate that forms part of the system architecture itself, positioned between inference an...
Waleed A. Al Shehri· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
It is found that the pricing content resides in the institutional layer: firms in the top half of the markdown distribution underperform the bottom half by roughly 25 percentage points in market-adjusted cumulative abnormal returns over the three years after ChatGPT, while sorting on technical exposure alone produces n...
Claes Backman, Christos A. Makridis· CESifo working papers· 0 citations
This work analyzes 281 AI contribution policies and identifies ten countermeasures against AI slop, targeting pull requests, users, and autonomous agents, to give maintainers and researchers a baseline and a labeled corpus for studying the impact of AI policies.
André C. Hora, Romain Robbes, Stefano Zacchiroli· 1 citation
This Article argues that interruption is an institutional practice, not simply a technical artifact, and develops a theory of stop along four dimensions and four paradigms: simple, sequenced, sequenced, networked, networked, and distributed.
Oren Perez· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.