Skip to content
Open access

Parallel MCMC via machine learning classification and a Kullback–Leibler divergence criterion

Jun 2024 · Metron · Vol 84, pp. 139 - 157 · 0 citations · 18 references
Mathematics

TL;DR

This study develops a Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence-based criterion that does not require calculating the full-posterior density and can be calculated using only information from the sub-posterior densities, which are generally obtained after implementing MCMC.

Abstract

In the era of Big Data, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, which are currently essential for Bayesian estimation, face significant computational challenges owing to their sequential nature. To achieve a faster and more effective parallel computation, we emphasize the critical role of the overlapped area of the posterior distributions based on partitioned data, which we term the reconstructable area. We propose a method that utilizes machine learning classifiers to effectively identify and extract MCMC draws obtained by parallel computations from the area based on posteriors based on partitioned sub-datasets, approximating the target posterior distribution based on the full dataset. This study also develops a Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence-based criterion. It does not require calculating the full-posterior density and can be calculated using only information from the sub-posterior densities, which are generally obtained after implementing MCMC. This simplifies the hyperparameter tuning in training classifiers. The simulation studies validated the efficacy of the proposed method. This approach contributes to ongoing research on parallelizing MCMC methods and may offer insights for future developments in Bayesian computation for large-scale data analyses.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Oct 2026

Demystifying and unifying ELBO for Probabilistic Deep Learning Inversion

Variational inference has emerged as a computationally efficient framework for solving Bayesian inverse problems. Rather than relying on random sampling in high-dimensional model spaces, it reformulates probabilistic inference as an optimization problem, marking a fundamental shift from sampling-based to optimization...

Jia-Jia Sun, Si-Hong Wu · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Theoretical and Practical Advances in Hierarchical Bayesian Deep Learning Methodology

Reliable uncertainty quantification remains an important challenge in AI. Hierarchical Bayesian methods provide a principled framework for this by representing unknown quantities through posterior distributions. Joint inference of neural-network parameters and prior hyperparameters is challenging for conventional Marko...

N. K. Chada, S. Cotter, K. J. H. Law et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Posterior sampling by source-space MCMC via prior-based few-step transport maps

Bayesian inference increasingly uses informative but implicit priors represented only by samples, such as historical ensembles, simulator outputs, and pretrained generative models. The same computational problem appears in the test-time guidance task (generalized Bayes), where an explicit positive weight, e.g., an expo...

Hoang Phuc Hau Luu, Marcelo Hartmann, Zhong-Jian Wang · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

Efficient Mass Matrix Estimation with Gaussian Cooling

We introduce an algorithm for efficiently preconditioning log-concave and log-smooth distributions that scales logarithmically with the condition number of the underlying distribution. Based on Gaussian cooling, our multistage method approximately samples from a sequence of well-conditioned distributions to construct a...

Jake Hofgard, Michael A. Lindsey · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Variational objectives for amortized Bayesian inference in inverse problems: The role of posterior conditioning

Variational autoencoders (VAEs) offer an efficient approach to amortized Bayesian inference for inverse problems, but posterior accuracy can depend strongly on the choice of variational regularization, particularly when the inverse problem contains weakly identified parameter directions. This study investigates three o...

Abhishek Srivastava, Arijit Hazra, Rajesh Dubbaku · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Active machine learning using MCMC Bayesian neural networks

Background Standard neural networks require large labelled datasets for strong generalization, which is often costly to annotate. Active learning (AL) reduces annotation costs by selecting the most informative samples for labelling based on model uncertainty, and Bayesian methods are a natural source of such uncertaint...

Devesh Jawla, John D. Kelleher, Maria Chiara Leva · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.