Aug 2026· International Multidisciplinary Journal of Emerging Technologies and Applications· 0 citations· 37 references
TL;DR
A systematic literature review synthesized primary empirical studies published between 2019 and 2025 and retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar, and argues that the value of AI tools depends less on the technology itself than on how it is pedagogically mediated.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly used in English as a foreign or second language (EFL/ESL) academic writing classrooms, yet evidence on their instructional use and effects remains fragmented across tools, contexts, and study designs. This systematic literature review synthesized primary empirical studies published between 2019 and 2025 and retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and appraised the methodological quality of the included studies. Three research questions were addressed, concerning the AI tools used in EFL/ESL writing instruction, their effects on writing quality and skills, and the associated challenges and ethical considerations. The findings indicate that three categories of tools, automated writing evaluation and grammar-checking tools, paraphrasing tools, and generative AI are used across all stages of the writing process, frequently in combination. Their reported effects reveal a tension between consistently documented gains at the surface level of grammar, mechanics, and vocabulary and less certain gains in higher-order aspects such as content, organization, and coherence, which appear mainly in studies with stronger designs or newer generative models. Recurring concerns include student overreliance, academic integrity, and the uneven distribution of benefits across learners of differing proficiency. The review contributes an EFL-specific synthesis spanning multiple tool types and educational levels, and argues that the value of AI tools depends less on the technology itself than on how it is pedagogically mediated. Implications for teacher-guided, critically evaluated use and directions for future research are discussed.
A systematic literature review synthesized 22 primary empirical studies published between 2018 and 2025 and concludes that AI tools are most productive when used as supportive writing companions within explicitly scaffolded and collaborative learning environments.
Rifyal Kalam Mahardhika, M. Margana, R. Herda et al.· Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly integrated into undergraduate English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education; however, evidence regarding its technical and pedagogical limitations remains fragmented.
This systematic review synthesized empirical evidence on the technical and pedagogical li...
Verónica Espinoza-Celi, Alba Vargas-Saritama· Frontiers in Education· 0 citations
It is argued that the thoughtful integration of AI feedback with teacher feedback, grounded in pedagogical principles and human judgment, can significantly enhance L2 writing instruction.
O. Jamoom, Saaid Ali Omar· Comprehensive Journal of Sci...· 0 citations
The potential of AI tools to enhance EFL writing autonomy is evident yet not uniformly distributed across different functions, most notably in "humans-in-the-loop" models, but not to the exclusion of teacher scaffolding.
Maha A. Alzahrani· European Journal of English...· 0 citations
The results show that AI-assisted writing tools have the potential to improve learners' writing performance in five dimensions: grammatical accuracy, lexical richness, register appropriateness, content completeness, and structural logic.
This study systematically reviews the current evidence on AI in academic writing using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) guidelines and contributes a comprehensive synthesis of current research by integrating pedagogical, assessment, and human perspectives through the...
Saidatul Akmar Zainal Abidin, Noor Hanim Rahmat· International journal of res...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.