LIRA is introduced, a local cross-layer action-conditioning mechanism that formulates VLM-to-action conditioning as depth-aware information routing and improves the principal aggregate metrics over the VLA-Adapter baseline under the same 0.5B-parameter configuration.
Abstract
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models transform representations from pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) into robot actions, yet the interface that routes intermediate VLM features into action decoders remains underexplored. Existing designs either expose only a narrow part of the representation hierarchy or rigidly match each decoder block to one VLM layer, restricting access to complementary task evidence across depths. We introduce LIRA, a local cross-layer action-conditioning mechanism that formulates VLM-to-action conditioning as depth-aware information routing. LIRA operates on task-token features and LIRA Query features derived from intermediate VLM states, then assigns each Parallel Fusion Block a depth-aligned local window centered on its corresponding VLM layer. Parallel Fusion Blocks aggregate neighboring LIRA Query features and integrate them with task-token features and proprioceptive inputs before action prediction. This routing interface leaves the backbone architecture, action decoder, and supervised training recipe unchanged. Across LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, CALVIN ABC$\rightarrow$D, and real-world manipulation, LIRA improves the principal aggregate metrics over the VLA-Adapter baseline under the same 0.5B-parameter configuration. In zero-shot transfer to LIBERO-Plus, LIRA increases average success from 59.1% to 78.0%, an 18.9-point gain indicating improved robustness under controlled distribution shifts.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) to guide action generation for robot control. VLMs provide hierarchical visual-semantic representations that evolve across layers, from local visual geometry to abstract, language-aligned semantics; different manipulation tasks may...
Zi-Rong Song, Zheng Lu, Hao-Ran Liao et al.· 2 citations
Vision-language-action (VLA) models encode semantic information from vision-language pretraining, but manipulation also requires precise spatial reasoning. We present GeoBridge-VLA, a two-stage method for learning geometric features from a pretrained VLA's frozen visual encoder and using them for action prediction. Sta...
Hyunjung Song, Kangmin Kim, Loren Jinsoo Um et al.· 0 citations
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models provide strong behavioral priors for robotic manipulation, yet efficiently adapting them to downstream tasks remains challenging. Recent work addresses this challenge by adapting frozen VLAs through online reinforcement learning (RL), whose sample efficiency depends on the quality of...
De-Hao Huang, Jian-Bang Liu, Jian-Pan Gao et al.· 0 citations
V-Link is proposed, which explicitly recovers visual representations during the vision-language (VL) to action (A) feature transfer and injects them into Action DiT through asymmetric pathways.
Ye-Hao Lu, Jia-Rui Yang, Yu-Ning Su et al.· 0 citations
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models map visual observations and language instructions to continuous robot actions, but a diffusion-based action expert (AE) poses a key challenge for low-bit post-training quantization (PTQ). The AE is repeatedly invoked across denoising steps and policy queries, where fixed calibration...
Jin Hyun, Jung Gyu Min, Gyuhyun Jung et al.· 0 citations
Vision-language-action (VLA) policies emphasize semantic understanding, whereas world-action models (WAMs) learn predictive representations of environment dynamics. Systems that expose a policy to both sources often still concentrate action computation on a single expert. We present EWAM, an action-centric unified embo...
Hao Wang, Jia-Jun Wen, Jing-Zhi Liu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.