Query-Aware Context Selection for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

FUSE-RAG: A Unified Architecture for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Large language models may suffer from insufficient context use and unsupported generation in question answering tasks that require external knowledge. This study compares the main strategies affecting retrieval and generation performance in retrieval-augmented generation systems within a common experimental setting. In addition to a standard dense retrieval baseline, we evaluate multi-query, hypothetical document, hypothetical question, sparse-dense hybrid retrieval, and chunk compression, and we also propose an integrated method (FUSERAG) that combines these components. Experiments are conducted on a dataset containing 223 documents, 7933 chunks, and 1488 question-answer instances. Results show that the proposed method achieves the highest Mean Reciprocal Rank, nDCG at 5, and recall at 5 at the retrieval level, while the sparse-dense hybrid approach yields the best generation results.

Could You Elaborate? A Multi-perspective Evaluation of Query Reformulation in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

SAC-RAG: Semantic Adaptive Context Compression for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Experimental results show that SAC-RAG reduces token consumption by 38%–58% at the cost of only a 1–2 percentage point EM drop, with EM actually improving after compression for reasoning-type questions, achieving the optimal quality–efficiency trade-off in terms of token consumption.

Testing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems with Chunk Coverage

Chunk Coverage (CC), an oracle-independent test adequacy criterion for testing the retrieval component of RAG systems, is introduced and results show that CC captures retrieval diversity relevant to effective testing without requiring test oracles.

Query Expansion Is More Than Generation: Improving Dense Retrieval through Better Integration

This work introduces AnchorQE, a training-free method that separately encodes the original query and its expansion before interpolating them, and shows that AnchorQE improves retrieval effectiveness by up to 12.89% when compared to widely-used expansion-only or text-level concatenation baselines across TREC-DL, LoTTE, and BEIR.

A Reproducible and Budget-Aware Framework for Evaluating Local Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Robustness to Perturbations

The idea of context is no longer considered secondary in the construction of language-model systems. With the use of local Retrieval-Augmented Generation, even a tiny modification of the prompt or the context might produce another set of retrievals, citations, and ultimately different answers; however, in practice, tests are often performed with only one version of the question. In this work, we suggest a local context-engineering framework for exploring perturbation robustness, reproducibility, and budgetfriendly assessment in one unified pipeline. Local RAG is built on several small teaching packs for the models; perturbations are introduced to the queries, each experiment is recorded in capsule format, and a gate mechanism based on the decision tree is used to judge if the whole perturbation suite can be skipped, minimized, or run. As a result, the augmented capsule-derived data set contains 3,570 perturbation rows, out of which 2,619 labeled rows are used for retraining. In this labeled subset, BLEU scores are available in 446 cases, answer perplexity and semanticjudgment scores are available in 1,668 cases, citation overlap is available for all rows, and retrieval overlap is available for 2,099 rows. The final decision tree obtains 0.915 ROC-AUC, 0.891 PR-AUC, 0.913 accuracy, 0.863 F1 score, and expected savings of 76.5% on the held-out augmented test split. A more conservative threshold setting lowers the stable-risk value from 0.084 to 0.062, while reducing expected savings to 57.4%. Thus, we provide a local study pipeline to examine the effect of perturbations on answer stability, contradictions, robustness, and budget-friendly evaluation.