Jul 2026· Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE· Vol 49, pp. 1540 - 1549· 0 citations· 75 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Improved recognition of predictive markers, alongside development of tailored prognostic models, is essential to guide antithrombotic therapy and optimize outcomes in this high‐risk population.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia worldwide. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is closely intertwined with AF through a bidirectional relationship: pre‐existing AF is associated with increased risk of AMI, while AMI predisposes to new‐onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF). This narrative review synthesizes evidence on the global burden of AF in the setting of AMI: pre‐existing AF, NOAF following AMI, and the prognostic implications of AF in AMI, encompassing the ‘past, present and future’ of AF in AMI. Pre‐existing AF is present in 3%–4% of patients with AMI and has demonstrated an independent association with acute coronary syndromes, mediated by systemic inflammation, prothrombotic states, demand ischemia, and coronary thromboembolism. NOAF complicates 5%–20% of AMI cases, with peak onset within the first six months. Predictive factors include age, comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease, markers of inflammation (including systemic immune‐inflammation index and hs‐CRP), neurohormonal activation (NT‐proBNP), echocardiographic parameters of diastolic dysfunction and left atrial strain, and electrocardiographic features such as QRS fragmentation. Multiple predictive models for NOAF have been developed with varying discriminatory performance. Emerging research suggests that machine learning may provide superior risk stratification, though further study is needed. AF in the context of AMI confers substantially increased risk of mortality, stroke, bleeding, and heart failure, with NOAF showing particularly strong prognostic significance. Improved recognition of predictive markers, alongside development of tailored prognostic models, is essential to guide antithrombotic therapy and optimize outcomes in this high‐risk population.
In this large cohort with AS, AF was independently associated with an increased risk of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, regardless of treatment strategy or AS flow-gradient pattern.
Thomas Reed-Métayer, Pier-Anthony Bouchard, Sébastien Hecht et al.· Journal of the American Hear...· 0 citations
Although the presence of AF in patients with ACS was not independently associated with CV mortality, it was independently associated with CV-related hospitalizations despite contemporary treatment strategies, suggesting closer follow-up and more intensive management of ACS patients with AF may be necessary to reduce th...
Murat Gençaslan, Ceyhun Yucel, M. Ardıç et al.· Catheterization and cardiova...· 0 citations
Background/Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) frequently coexist and are linked by shared risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms. Their association is consistently related to worse clinical outcomes. This narrative review summarizes current evidence reg...
Mihai Grigore, Andreea-Maria Grigore, R. Martin-Graur et al.· Biomedicines· 0 citations
The proposed LA staging framework offers mechanistic insights into how the LA adapts to progressive diastolic dysfunction in HCM and is associated with a graded risk of NOAF and may help tailor AF surveillance strategies.
Jaehyun Lim, I. Hwang, Ji-Hyun Kim et al.· Journal of the American Coll...· 1 citation
Age was the strongest and most consistent predictor of adverse clinical outcomes, whereas AF type lost prognostic significance after adjustment, support age and overall clinical burden as key determinants of prognosis, favouring a patient-centred approach over AF subtype classification.
A. López-Pena, Juliana Elices Teja, Olga Durán Bobín et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.