Developing a GenAI agent that autonomously formulates, prioritizes, and completes a limited set of code improvement tasks enterprise-wide is reported, and a Difference-in-Differences analysis found that automated improvements had an effect on the reduction of future maintenance effort that was as strong as or stronger than manual improvements confirming the feasibility of autonomous maintenance.
Abstract
Automating software development is an important aspect of software engineering. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Agents that control multiple tools and use feedback with some autonomy to iteratively solve problems are emerging as promising tools for increased software production. To achieve autonomous software maintenance with minimal human involvement, such agents must not only solve human-posed problems but also decide which problems to address. We report our experiences developing a GenAI agent that autonomously formulates, prioritizes, and completes a limited set of code improvement tasks enterprise-wide, and we evaluate this agent from two perspectives: first, developing a methodology to estimate effort savings from such autonomous agents by comparing time spent on agent-introduced tasks and agent maintenance efforts against manual execution; and second, comparing the impact of manual versus agent-driven code improvements on future codebase maintenance. Our results demonstrate significant effort savings, even after accounting for effort in agent development, and a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) analysis found that automated improvements had an effect on the reduction of future maintenance effort that was as strong as or stronger than manual improvements confirming the feasibility of autonomous maintenance. While the relaxed completion and timeliness needs of perfective maintenance make it an ideal candidate for autonomy, a degree of autonomy may be achievable in other areas of software development as well.
The evolution from reactive to proactive AI systems represents a paradigm shift in software engineering, enabling autonomous agents to anticipate requirements, plan complex workflows, and execute multi-step development tasks without human intervention. This paper presents a novel multi-agent architecture for autonomous code generation and software maintenance in enterprise environments. Our framework integrates specialized AI agents for requirements analysis, code synthesis, testing, and deployment, coordinated through a hierarchical planning system with adaptive decision-making capabilities. The system employs reinforcement learning to optimize task allocation, learn from code review feedback, and improve over time. Experimental evaluation on real-world enterprise codebases demonstrates that our proactive agent system achieves 87.3% automated issue resolution, reduces bug fix latency by 62%, and maintains code quality metrics comparable to human developers. The framework successfully handles complex refactoring tasks, security vulnerability remediation, and feature implementation with minimal human oversight, representing a significant advancement toward fully autonomous software engineering workflows.
Saher Elsayed, Samer Abubaker, M. Ali et al.· Annual International Compute...· 0 citations
A comprehensive overview of the existing tools and frameworks for implementing MAS in software engineering and a set of lessons learned and challenges that can help researchers and practitioners to select a suitable MAS framework according to their needs are provided.
Mariama Celi Serafim De Oliveira, M. Ibiyo, Marco Gianrusso et al.· 0 citations
A three-level taxonomy inspired by autonomous driving that distinguishes degrees of autonomy along a roadmap from today’s AI-assisted development workflows to fully autonomous software development in which AI systems autonomously identify demands and design, implement, verify, and maintain software without human oversight is introduced.
A ScholForge - hierarchical multi-agent LLM system that tackles end-to-end software engineering research end-to-end, with a natural-language research goal, and produces working code, experimental results, and a compiled manuscript without human intervention.
A. Stepin, Boris Tolstokulakov, V. Kulikov et al.· SIGSOFT FSE Companion· 0 citations
ACEM (Agentic Cost Estimation Model), which decomposes total agentic development cost into three additive dimensions: LLM, HITL, and infrastructure cost, is presented as a fully specified model structure and calibration methodology, with constants left symbolic pending empirical grounding.
Overall, repository-preserved Agent Plans under these tool-specific directories appear to be a narrow but informative artifact for studying task intent and execution guidance in human-agent workflows.
M. Abubakar, Seyedmoein Mohsenimofidi, Jai Lal Lulla et al.· 1 citation