Construction and validation of explainable machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality for patients with acute type A aortic dissection surgery
Aug 2026· Frontiers in Medicine· Vol 13· 0 citations· 22 references
Medicine
TL;DR
An explainable RF model to predict in-hospital mortality after ATAAD surgery is developed and internally validated and is best regarded as a promising preliminary rule-out/triage tool that requires multicenter external validation before clinical use.
Abstract
Objective To construct and validate a risk prediction model of in-hospital mortality using machine learning (ML) algorithm in a retrospective cohort of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients undergoing surgical treatment. Methods Patients with ATAAD undergoing surgical treatment between January 2014 and December 2022 were enrolled to predict in-hospital mortality. To address class imbalance and overfitting, we developed a robust Random Forest (RF)-based classification framework using a nested stratified 5-fold cross-validation (NCV). This was a single-center, retrospective study with internal validation only; no external validation was performed. Performance was evaluated via ROC-AUC, Precision-Recall Area Under the Curve (PR-AUC), sensitivity, brier score and calibration metrics, with Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) utilized for feature interpretation. Results A total of 639 ATAAD patients were included in the analytical cohort, with an in-hospital mortality rate of 5.6% (36/639). The calibrated full RF model (50 preoperative clinical variables) achieved an ROC-AUC of 0.666, PR-AUC of 0.145, brier score of 0.051, and calibration slope of 0.836, with a sensitivity of 0.694 at an optimized threshold. A parsimonious 15-feature model maintained robust performance (ROC-AUC: 0.752, PR-AUC: 0.207, brier score: 0.050 and calibration slope: 0.934). SHAP analysis identified Creatine Kinase-MB, Myoglobin, and Fibrinogen Concentration as the top mortality predictors. Conclusion We developed and internally validated an explainable RF model to predict in-hospital mortality after ATAAD surgery. Given the low positive predictive value and high negative predictive value, the model is best regarded as a promising preliminary rule-out/triage tool that requires multicenter external validation before clinical use.
Background Machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly applied to surgical risk prediction; however, their comparative performance and temporal generalizability remain inadequately evaluated. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 9,956 adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve sur...
Jian-Hui Zhou, Cheng-Xin Zhang· Frontiers in Cardiovascular...· 0 citations
Logistic Regression showed potential as an interpretable early ICU risk-stratification tool and externally validated machine learning models for in-hospital mortality prediction in patients with diabetes and ARDS.
Ya-Lin Dong, Meng-Xue Hou, Qian-Qian Wang et al.· Shock· 0 citations
The use of a structured machine learning approach to predict 30-day mortality in patients with acute and chronic CAD demonstrated promising discriminative performance, providing valuable insights that could enhance personalized care and inform clinical decisions.
Septi Melisa, P. Phan, Sheng-Hsuan Chien et al.· International Journal of Car...· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
This multicenter study developed and validated an interpretable machine learning model integrating granular nursing and emergency department data collected within the first 24 hours to predict in-hospital mortality in acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
METHODS
We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 5,014 adult AI...
An XGBoost-based prediction model with good performance for early mortality prediction in CA patients was developed and model interpretability was enhanced using SHAP analysis.
Yi-Wu Sun, Liang Wang, Hongjiang You et al.· Injury· 0 citations
An interpretable RF-based machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis was developed and internally validated and showed acceptable discrimination, reasonable calibration, and potential clinical net benefit in internal validation.
Tian-Yu Zhao, Ke-Xin Wen, Xu-Min Han et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.