Clinical and radiographic outcomes of lateral sinus augmentation using a controlled osteotomy strategy: an analytical retrospective observational study
The WF technique was associated with clinically manageable surgical complications and radiographic bone gain in this single-surgeon cohort, but no conclusions regarding superiority or non-inferiority relative to conventional rotary or piezoelectric techniques can be drawn.
Abstract
Lateral sinus augmentation is a widely used procedure for implant placement in the posterior maxilla with insufficient residual bone height. This study retrospectively described the clinical and radiographic outcomes of lateral sinus augmentation performed using a controlled osteotomy strategy, referred to as the Wedge and Feather (WF) technique, and explored factors potentially associated with vertical bone gain.
This descriptive retrospective case series included consecutive patients who underwent lateral sinus augmentation using the WF technique. Clinical and radiographic data were collected from routine records. Vertical bone gain and complication rates were summarized descriptively. Because of the small sample size and absence of a control group, inferential analyses were considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating.
A total of 38 patients (43 sinus augmentation sites, 55 implants) was included. The mean vertical bone gain measured on postoperative panoramic radiographs was 8.5 ± 2.3 mm (range: 3.8–13.3 mm). Schneiderian membrane perforation occurred in 2 sites (4.7%), intraoperative bleeding in 1 site (2.3%), and postoperative sinusitis in 3 sites (7.0%). No implant failure was observed during the available follow-up period; however, no formal survival analysis was performed.
Because this retrospective case series lacked a control group and postoperative bone gain was measured using panoramic radiographs rather than CBCT, the findings should be interpreted as descriptive and hypothesis-generating. The WF technique was associated with clinically manageable surgical complications and radiographic bone gain in this single-surgeon cohort, but no conclusions regarding superiority or non-inferiority relative to conventional rotary or piezoelectric techniques can be drawn.
For teeth with a preoperative buccal plate of bone ≥1 mm, the bone lid technique provided more favorable radiographic healing and better preserved alveolar arch contour than conventional osteotomy.
Ya-Ni Chen, Zhi-Kang Wang, Jian Yuan et al.· Journal of Endodontics· 0 citations
TK technique showed no measurable benefit over free-lay coverage in preserving BH after maxillary MSA, and greater mesiodistal graft width was found to be correlated with higher BH values.
Emrah Bilen· European Annals of Dental Sc...· 0 citations
The findings suggest that the CCPG technique may provide favorable outcomes in terms of bone gain and graft stability compared with the Khoury technique, and may be considered in the management of complex alveolar defects.
M. F. Al-Jamal· The Journal of craniofacial...· 0 citations
Background/Objectives: Maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) via the lateral approach is a well-established procedure for prosthetic rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxillae. However, late complications are often nonspecific, with an incompletely understood aetiology. We evaluated patients with atypical late c...
Patrick Bandura, C. Schnell, Claas Willem Molsen et al.· Diagnostics· 0 citations
Insufficient bone volume in the posterior maxilla remains one of the principal challenges in implant dentistry. Progressive alveolar bone resorption and maxillary sinus pneumatization frequently compromise implant placement, necessitating sinus floor augmentation procedures. The lateral window and crestal (transcrestal...
Armend Rexhepi· INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS FROM...· 0 citations
In this retrospective cohort, carefully adjusted interim prostheses did not appear to adversely affect bone healing or graft success, and no robust difference was demonstrated for actual bone gain, bone loss, or complications.
Zoé Gaudimier, Samy Tawfik, Elise Amblard et al.· Journal of Stomatology Oral...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.