Aug 2026· Transactions on Computing Science· 0 citations
TL;DR
A multi-agent testing framework in which requirement analysis, test-case generation, sandboxed execution, and defect detection are delegated to four distinct agents, and in which detection rests on a composite rule combining the execution signal with the semantic judgment of a dedicated diagnostic agent.
Abstract
Research on integrating specialized, language-model-based agents for automated test-case generation remains limited, and the detection criteria under which such systems are evaluated have not been standardized, which makes reported rates difficult to compare across studies. This paper presents a multi-agent testing framework in which requirement analysis, test-case generation, sandboxed execution, and defect detection are delegated to four distinct agents, and in which detection rests on a composite rule combining the execution signal with the semantic judgment of a dedicated diagnostic agent. The framework is evaluated on the QuixBugs dataset of forty Python programs under three criteria of increasing strictness. A two-run differential protocol against the reference implementation, recommended here as the primary indicator, yields a detection rate of 55.0%, against 90.0% under the unconditional criterion conventional in prior work and 5.0% under a strict criterion requiring the suite to pass entirely on correct code. The thirty-five-point gap is traced to language-model test artifacts, of which hallucinated oracle values and signature mismatches account for the majority. An ablation with a same-model single-agent baseline attributes the framework’s advantage to role decomposition rather than to the diagnostic agent specifically, and the distribution of detection across the fourteen defect classes defined by the benchmark is reported descriptively.
A configurable multi-agent framework for benchmarking LLMs in Prolog code generation that combines a Code Generator Agent, a deterministic execution layer using SWI-Prolog, and an evaluator based on the LLM-as-a-Judge paradigm that supports model-agnostic experimentation and evaluates outputs across functional correctness, efficiency, structural properties and evaluator reliability.
Nikolaos Karamousalidis, P. Kefalas· SN Computer Science· 0 citations
TestAgent is proposed, an LLM-based test generation approach that addresses the above limitations by emulating human testing practices via a multi-agent collaboration mechanism and equips TestAgent with a set of tool APIs that can be invoked dynamically in an on-demand and adaptive manner.
Quanjun Zhang, Ye Shang, Siqi Gu et al.· 0 citations
TestAgent, a multi-agent tool implemented as a VS Code extension that automates the generation of high-quality unit tests for Java projects using repository-level Code Knowledge Graphs, demonstrates its practical utility for regression testing and bug discovery.
Ye Shang, Quanjun Zhang, Zheng Zhan et al.· SIGSOFT FSE Companion· 0 citations
This paper proposes the Evaluation Context Protocol (ECP), an early-stage, vendor-neutral framework intended to act as a portable evaluation contract layer for agentic systems and describes an open-source reference implementation that includes adapters for LangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI, and PydanticAI.
A ScholForge - hierarchical multi-agent LLM system that tackles end-to-end software engineering research end-to-end, with a natural-language research goal, and produces working code, experimental results, and a compiled manuscript without human intervention.
A. Stepin, Boris Tolstokulakov, V. Kulikov et al.· SIGSOFT FSE Companion· 0 citations
Multi-agent systems built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for complex tasks requiring autonomous planning, tool use, and inter-agent coordination. However, the non-deterministic nature of LLM outputs and the emergent behavior arising from agent interactions render traditional test oracles ineffective, creating a critical gap in quality assurance for agentic AI. This work introduces MORPHAGENT, a framework designed to address the oracle problem in multi-agent LLM systems through trace-based behavioral analysis. Our contributions are threefold: (1) goal-preservation relations that verify consistent goal achievement under input perturbations, (2) coordination-consistency relations that validate inter-agent delegation and communication patterns under agent substitution and reordering, and (3) tool-use integrity relations that ensure semantic equivalence of tool invocation sequences under prompt paraphrasing. MorphAgent instruments agent execution to capture structured traces comprising planning steps, tool calls, message exchanges, and final outputs, then systematically applies metamorphic transformations and checks behavioral invariants without requiring ground-truth oracles. We evaluate the framework on four multi-agent benchmarks spanning code generation, research synthesis, customer service, and data analysis tasks, encompassing 2,840 source-followup execution pairs across three LLM backends. Results show that MORPHAGENT detects 82.0% of seeded behavioral faults, including 90.3% of coordination failures and 81.7% of goal-deviation faults, while maintaining a false positive rate of 6.1%. The framework uncovers 14 previously unreported behavioral anomalies in established multi-agent frameworks, demonstrating its practical utility for assuring agentic AI reliability. These results suggest that trace-based metamorphic testing can serve as a practical foundation for reliable validation of emerging agentic AI systems.
Gopalakrishnan Marimuthu· International Conference on...· 0 citations