Skip to content

Generative artificial intelligence for nanomaterial discovery and nanoengineering: From data-driven design to autonomous laboratories

Dec 2026 · Next Nanotechnology · 0 citations · 61 references
Machine Learning in Materials Science

Abstract

From conventional trial-and-error experimentation, nanomaterials research is moving toward data-centric and autonomous discovery paradigms that couple nanotechnology with artificial intelligence (AI). In this review, we critically examine how generative artificial intelligence, including generative adversarial networks, variational autoencoders, diffusion models, transformer architectures and large language models, enables inverse design of nanomaterials and supports nanoengineering across diverse application domains. The review provides a structured and critical survey on AI-driven nanomaterial discovery, focusing on studies where generative models explore nanoscale composition–structure spaces and where self-driving laboratories (SDLs) close the loop between design, synthesis, characterization and performance evaluation. We provide a comparative analysis of major generative architectures for nanomaterial tasks, highlighting differences in validity, novelty, diversity, conditional control and computational cost. Representative case studies are discussed in which generative models and autonomous experimentation have led to experimentally validated nanomaterials, such as quantum dots, nano-porous frameworks and functional nanocomposites. A dedicated section analyzes data infrastructures and nano-specific challenges, including size-dependent phenomena, surface and interface dominance, defect sensitivity, nano-bio interactions and dataset bias. Fundamental limitations of artificial intelligence in nanomaterials are examined, covering data scarcity for morphology-rich systems, interpretability, reproducibility, safety and regulatory aspects. Finally, the review outlines research priorities for multimodal foundation models, physics-informed generative frameworks, agentic AI scientists, digital twins (DTs) and next-generation SDLs that can accelerate nanomaterial discovery while remaining scientifically reliable and ethically responsible. Together, these perspectives position generative AI as a key engine for future nanoengineering, provided that nano-specific data ecosystems and rigorous validation workflows are developed alongside algorithmic advances.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of such models.

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17
#computer vision Open access Jun 2016

Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model

The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.

Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 178 citations · ⚡14
#computer vision Open access Oct 2016

Software Startups - A Research Agenda

Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.

M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 157 citations · ⚡17
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#computer vision Review Open access May 2015

A survey study on major technical barriers affecting the decision to adopt cloud services

The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.

Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al. · 111 citations · ⚡8

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.