Envs-FORGE is presented, a prompting policy that converts verifier rewards into per-seed environment-synthesis actions and solves a per-seed mixed-integer linear program (MILP) to choose the action that conditions generation.
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) for terminal agents needs executable training environments with reliable rewards and useful difficulty. Fixed recipes such as few-shot, Self-Instruct, and Evol-Instruct apply the same prompting policy to every seed, even when the current policy would benefit from a harder, easier, or simply different task. We present Envs-FORGE, a prompting policy that converts verifier rewards into per-seed environment-synthesis actions. Envs-FORGE estimates seed pass rates, scores six projection--direction actions around a target learning frontier, and solves a per-seed mixed-integer linear program (MILP) to choose the action that conditions generation. The selected action drives synchronized rewriting of the instruction, fixtures, oracle solution, tests, and Docker environment; only gold-verified bundles enter RL training. The indexed MILP form also supports optional soft skill coverage for portfolio planning. On Qwen 3.5 35B, Envs-FORGE improves Pass@1 over Base by 9.2 percentage points on tb-core (40.0% to 49.2%) and 6.4 points on tb-2.0 (23.0% to 29.4%), exceeding the strongest fixed-recipe baseline by 2.4 and 2.1 points. It reaches 77.1% on SWE-bench Verified versus 73.4% for Base, and improves tb-core by 6.8--9.2 points across the evaluated 4B--35B models. All synthesis methods export 100 verified environments and use 2.27M--2.88M synthesis tokens, placing the comparison at the same downstream training-set size and the same operational scale. The source code is available at https://github.com/DataArcTech/DataArc-SynData-Toolkit/.
Executable environments enable LLM agents to learn from the consequences of their actions. For embodied agents, those consequences extend beyond whether the current task succeeds: completing a delivery can consume the time, energy, or money needed for later work. Learning to plan therefore requires environments that pr...
Haoqiang Kang, Yi-Ming Zhang, Yi-Yang Guo et al.· 2 citations
SINKFLEX-RL, a modular training system for RL in dual-control tool-use environments that combines a Gymnasium-compatible environment wrapper, a VERL-style rollout dataflow, group-relative policy optimization without a separate value model, and a sink-aware FlexAttention path designed to preserve model-specific sink sca...
Zelei Cheng, Amritansh Mishra, Sambit Sahu et al.· 0 citations
Designing dense reward functions for low-level reinforcement learning (RL) control remains difficult. Recent work uses large language models (LLMs) to iteratively generate and refine reward functions using policy-training feedback within scripted search algorithms. However, evaluating each candidate requires a full RL...
T1, a Mixture-of-Experts model of 122B total trained with reinforcement learning, operating a real shell in a cloud sandbox for up to 300+ tool-call turns per task, rewarded by executing each task's own verifier by executing each task's own verifier.
Jun-Yao Yang, Yu-Cheng Shi, Zhong-Zhi Li et al.· 8 citations
Model-based control can directly execute specified objectives, while learning can amortize such behaviors into reactive policies, making their combination a natural solution to multi-stage manipulation. We introduce Semantically UNified (SUN) Programs, typed executables that compile grounded relations into aligned opti...
Wei-Qi Wang, Zhi Li, Yuliang Lei et al.· 0 citations
ARISE-RL, a novel full-cycle self-evolution framework that couples a task/rubric Generator and a reasoning Solver through rubric-mediated co-evolution, is proposed and ECR-Bench, an expert-calibrated rubric benchmark suite covering single-tool deep research and multi-tool travel planning is presented.
Fan-Rui Zhang, Rui-Xue Ding, Qiang Zhang et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.