This work proposes SCATE, a framework for adaptive, automated supervision of coding agents that replaces human intervention during test generation by formulating supervision as a contextual bandit problem, which consistently outperforms state-of-the-art non-agentic approaches across all metrics.
Abstract
While autonomous coding agents have significantly advanced automated test generation, they remain fundamentally limited by lazy generation, a phenomenon where agents prematurely terminate tasks and systematically avoid complex programmatic logic, resulting in inadequate code coverage. Currently, mitigating this premature termination requires continuous human-in-the-loop supervision. This heavy reliance on human intuition creates a bottleneck that negates the efficiency gains of automated generation. We propose SCATE, a framework for adaptive, automated supervision of coding agents that replaces human intervention during test generation. By formulating supervision as a contextual bandit problem, SCATE learns to select the most promising testing actions based on the current coverage and class testability metrics, maximizing coverage gains while minimizing wasted generation effort. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that SCATE integrates seamlessly with different coding agents. When applied to GEMINI-CLI, it achieves 32.3% higher line coverage and 30.9% higher branch coverage than the agent-only baseline. A comparison with CLAUDE CODE confirms the framework dynamically adapts its policy to optimize each agent's unique strengths. SCATE also consistently outperforms state-of-the-art non-agentic approaches across all metrics.
Small language models and coding agents increasingly generate web front-end code, yet their outputs are typically evaluated primarily for functional correctness. A generated interface may compile, render, and pass unit tests while still violating established interface quality principles, including accessibility barriers, deceptive design patterns, poor visual hierarchy, and excessive decision complexity. Existing auditing approaches face a trade-off between cost, coverage, and scalability: expert human review provides rich judgment but is slow and expensive; frontier vision-language models offer broader reasoning capabilities but remain costly to deploy at scale; and rule-based tools such as axe-core and Lighthouse are inexpensive but primarily capture mechanically checkable accessibility issues. We investigate whether a lightweight vision-language model can serve as an effective critic for generated interfaces. We unify 19 interface-quality principles from three complementary sources of HCI knowledge: WCAG 2.2 accessibility standards, deceptive design taxonomies, and established theories of perception, cognition, and interaction. To train this critic, we construct a verified dataset of approximately 10,000 generated web pages by synthetically injecting known violations into clean, LLM-generated Tailwind pages. Continued reinforcement learning on a 4B vision-language model improves micro-F1 from 36\% to 84\%, with 13 of 19 principles exceeding 80\% F1. The resulting critic can audit generated interfaces, filter low-quality interface training data, and provide a reward signal for design-aware code generation. We release our data-generation recipe and injection/verification prompts to support reproducible evaluation and future work on scalable interface-quality assessment.
N. Mehta, Swathi Alse, Himani Kumawat et al.· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) have enabled AI scientist systems to automate scientific discovery, yet existing approaches most rely on static prompting or fixed workflows and fail to accumulate experience for continual improvement. We propose HypoForge, an experience-guided multi-agent framework that learns reusable scientific skills for automated hypothesis generation and hypothesis testing. HypoForge is built on the observation that these two stages involve different supervision signals. For hypothesis generation, where explicit feedback is unavailable, HypoForge adopts an adversarial generator--discriminator mechanism to improve reasoning through comparative critique. For hypothesis testing, where empirical feedback is available, HypoForge learns testing skills from execution outcomes and ground-truth results. By matching skill learning strategies with stage-specific supervision, HypoForge enables continual improvement without fine-tuning foundation models. Experiments on hypothesis generation and testing benchmarks show that HypoForge consistently outperforms existing AI scientist frameworks and skill-level variants. Further analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed stage-specific skill learning paradigms.
Ziqing Qian, Jiaying Lei, Yi-Fang Wang et al.· 0 citations
It is shown that test suites generated by the spec-driven agent are superior to the baseline and human-authored tests in 77.8% and 56.7% of the cases, respectively, and demonstrated improvements on following best practices, readability, and edge-case coverage.
Michele Tufano, James McClure, José Cambronero et al.· 0 citations
CHORUS is presented, a post-training framework that pushes performance beyond what a conventional supervised fine-tuning (SFT)-to-reinforcement learning (RL) pipeline achieves, and consolidates the resulting specialists into a single 4B model.
Hejia Zhang, Sheng Lu, Zhongming Yu et al.· 0 citations
AgentHPOBench, a sequential benchmark comprising 30 executable machine learning tasks across seven research categories, shows that current agents exhibit measurable experimental optimization ability across domains, but still face clear limitations in sustained iterative refinement, complex log diagnosis, and consistent progress toward reported reference performance.
Tianyu Huai, Tingshuo Fan, Xinchi Chen et al.· 0 citations
Multi-turn code agents rely on execution feedback to repair incorrect programs, yet standard reinforcement learning paradigms optimize and evaluate policy performance primarily using single-shot outcome rewards. This misalignment conflates initial code generation with feedback-driven refinement, discards granular execution signals across intermediate turns, and fails to evaluate whether the policy actually acquires self-repair capabilities. We propose Test-aware Policy Refinement (TaPR), a framework that transforms execution feedback into a dense per-turn test-pass-ratio reward under a consistent multi-turn interaction protocol. Across six models on 219 code-generation problems from LiveCodeBench, TaPR improves the pooled three-turn success rate (Pass@3) by 2.44 percentage points. In the predefined 7B/8B high-headroom slice, pooled accuracy increases from 30.25% to 33.56% (+3.31 pp), with 42 improvements and 13 regressions in paired trials. On a matched Qwen3-8B ablation, the dense reward supplies nonzero feedback in all of the first ten steps and reaches a higher Hard-subset peak than outcome-only GRPO within the tested budget, although GRPO nearly matches pooled Pass@3 by step 300. Our primary contribution is a reward-decomposition framework and a turn-aware evaluation protocol that decouple first-shot generation quality from multi-turn repair competence.
Aofan Liu, Jing Meng, Fangxin Liu et al.· 0 citations
