Advancing Trustworthy Clinical Decision Support Through Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Framework for Transparent, Interpretable, and Ethical Healthcare Analytics
Aug 2026· European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry· Vol 34· 0 citations
TL;DR
A narrative review of the evolving image of XAI as a tool to create trustworthy clinical decision support systems and how it can be performed based on the concepts of transparency, interpretability and moral decision-making concludes that explainability is a fundamental component to the use of AI in everyday clinical practice.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an integral component of clinical decision support systems, improving diagnostic accuracy, risk prediction, treatment planning, and healthcare resource management. But, the "black box" nature of many successful machine learning models has brought up concerns around trust and accountability, fairness and regulatory acceptance in the clinical setting. To address these challenges, Explanatory Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has become a promising method that aims to provide the explainability of the results predicted by the models without compromising the performance of the analysis. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the evolving image of XAI as a tool to create trustworthy clinical decision support systems and how it can be performed based on the concepts of transparency, interpretability and moral decision-making. It provides a summary of the current literature on essential explainability techniques, how they can be applied to different health care-related problems, and how they help increase trust and transparency in health care decision making. It also addresses human-AI collaboration, model validation, bias mitigation, privacy protection and governance frameworks to enable responsible use of AI. The new emerging developments, such as federated learning, multimodal explainable models, causal reasoning, and generative AI, are also discussed to emphasize future opportunities for clinically reliable and scalable intelligent healthcare systems. The review concludes that explainability is no longer a choice of technical attribute but rather a fundamental component to the use of AI in everyday clinical practice. For safe, equitable and trusted clinical decision support to benefit everyone in the health care sector, transparency, accountability and ethical governance will play a pivotal role.
A framework through XAI to incorporate various health data sources such as electronic health records, medical imaging, laboratory reports, and wearable sensor information, which can be integrated in the context of achieving higher predictive performance in disease prediction and treatment stratification, as well as dec...
M. Aparna, S. Lahane, Dr. Bharti A. Dixit· Journal of Intelligent Decis...· 0 citations
It is concluded that explainable artificial intelligence improves trust, reliability, and accountability in healthcare systems and is a prerequisite for successful integration of intelligent technologies into clinical practice.
Riya Jacob K· International Journal of Tec...· 0 citations
This paper distinguishes technical reliability from trust in AI-supported clinical decision-making, arguing that the two belong to distinct registers that current debates tend to elide and proposes replacing the expression "trustworthy AI" with "technically reliable AI," a distinction that relocates the conditions of t...
Miranda Boldrini, Damien Lacroux, Marie-Sophie von Braun et al.· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
Overall, causal AI represents a transformative advancement in healthcare analytics, supporting more informed, individualized, and evidence-based clinical decisions and has significant potential to improve patient outcomes and guide the future of intelligent, personalized healthcare delivery.
Mohammed Majid Bakhsh, Emran Hossain, M. K. K. Rony et al.· Personalized Medicine· 0 citations
Ask-Audit-Apply (AAA) is proposed as a clinician-facing framework for AI-supported clinical reasoning that specifies decision-level behavioral practices that may support education, supervision, and future research on safe AI integration across a range of CDS tools as these systems increasingly participate in clinical c...
Andrew Jenkins, Katherine W. Eisenberg, R. Ziegelstein· Journal of general internal...· 0 citations
This systematic review provides a comprehensive analysis of XAI methods specifically applied to tabular healthcare data for classification tasks, revealing that SHAP remains the dominant post-hoc method, achieving strong model fidelity but showing inconsistent alignment with clinical expert reasoning.
Angelower Santana-Velásquez, M. B. Salazar-Sánchez· Computers· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.