Skip to content
Open access

Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Executive Decision-Making: Enhancing Trust and Transparency in Management Information Systems

Aug 2026 · International journal of computer information systems and industrial management applications · 0 citations

TL;DR

Investigation of the significance of XAI in improving the executives’ decision-making process with greater transparency, trust, accountability, and the human–AI collaboration finds that explainable AI can boost managers’ confidence and enhance the quality, speed, and defensibility of strategic choices.

Abstract

AI has increasingly found its place in Management Information Systems (MIS), allowing organizations to process a huge amount of information and analyze it to find trends, predict business results, and enable decision-making. Yet, most AI technologies function as almost "black boxes," generating results without explaining the underlying logic behind them. This may lead to concerns about accountability, fairness, and ownership of decisions, hampering trust in the technology and limiting its acceptance in the company. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) solves these challenges through the provision of clear and intelligible accounts of the predictions and recommendations made by AI. This study investigates the significance of XAI in improving the executives’ decision-making process with greater transparency, trust, accountability, and the human–AI collaboration. By applying a conceptual and literature research methodology, the paper proposes a new MIS framework using XAI, where quality of data, transparency of model, relevance of the explanation, and human supervision advance the executives’ degree of trust and decision-making quality.The study claims that XAI must be regarded not only as a technical tool but as an organisational capability enabling managers to assess AI suggestions critically and act on them wisely. The research establishes the significance of user-centric explanations, governance systems, ongoing monitoring, and human responsibility. Findings indicate that explainable AI can boost managers’ confidence and enhance the quality, speed, and defensibility of strategic choices if the provided explanations are accurate, meaningful, easy to comprehend, and correlating with the goals of the organisation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Strategic Decision-Making in Management Information Systems: A Critical Review of Transparency, Trust, and Governance Frameworks

The review argues that XAI should not be treated as a technical add-on to predictive modelling; it must be embedded across the complete decision lifecycle through data governance, model documentation, explanation quality controls, stakeholder participation, human oversight and continuous monitoring.

Sampath Kini K · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Organizational Trust: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda

A review of recent literature exploring AI capabilities and ethics and their relationship with organizational trust identifies gaps in current literature and suggests a future research agenda including multilevel trust, industry differences in AI and ethical considerations, and measurement of responsible AI.

Fajer Danish, Muneera Alkhalifa · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Administrative Decision-Making: A Narrative Review of Applications, Benefits, Challenges, and Governance Implications

This review aims to review the literature on how AI can be used to assist in administrative decision making in the past five years using key academic databases and underscores the importance of using AI to assist – not replace – the human administrator, and to ensure decisions are responsible, accountable and ethical.

Adil Moh. Almalik · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI Technical Competence and Algorithmic Trust in Strategic Decision Making

Results show that AI Technical Competence (AITC) significantly predicts Algorithmic Trust, which fully mediates the link to Strategic Decision Quality, and Crucially, Task Complexity exerts a “dampening effect,” weakening the impact of trust on quality in hyper-complex scenarios.

C. C. Liu, C. S. Chen · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Agentic Artificial Intelligence in Business Decision-Making: A Framework for Human–AI Collaborative Governance and Strategic Value Creation

A validated, practitioner-usable framework for calibrating the degree of AI autonomy granted to decision workflows against the governance capacity of the organization is contributed, and offers implications for management education, internal audit, and enterprise risk functions responsible for overseeing algorithmic de...

P. Amutha, M. Bhuvaneswari · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.