This PRISMA-ScR scoping review mapped evidence on human-centered AI adoption in knowledge-intensive work and examined links with technostress, trust, autonomy, and employee well-being.
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming part of everyday knowledge work through generative AI, decision-support systems, algorithmic management, and AI-enabled organizational information systems. This development raises a central question: when does AI support employees, and when does it become a source of technostress, surveillance, uncertainty, and reduced autonomy? Objectives: This PRISMA-ScR scoping review mapped evidence on human-centered AI adoption in knowledge-intensive work and examined links with technostress, trust, autonomy, and employee well-being. Methods: Using a population–concept–context approach, we included peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers addressing AI adoption in knowledge-work settings and at least one human-centered or employee-related outcome. Publicly accessible databases and public metadata records were searched across Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, ScienceDirect, PubMed/MEDLINE, Business Source Complete, and APA PsycINFO. Searches were conducted in March 2026 and verified between 1 and 15 April 2026. Results: Twenty-six sources were included, comprising 17 journal articles and 9 peer-reviewed conference/proceedings sources. Five evidence clusters were identified: AI as a resource-demand system, information-system properties, generative AI work redesign, organizational implementation conditions, and short- versus long-term employee outcomes. Conclusions: Human-centered AI adoption in knowledge work requires transparent system design, organizational governance, employee participation, and long-term monitoring. The review contributes a business informatics implementation framework for trustworthy, ethically governed, and well-being-oriented AI use.
The findings indicate that AI-enabled organizational change is not only a technological process, but it also involves human and organizational processes that are shaped by leadership, communication, organizational support, employee voice, trust, skills development, and ethical governance.
Nawas Abubakar, Ilham Bangsim Mohammed, Olukunle O. Akanbi et al.· Journal of Social Developmen...· 0 citations
A process model is developed showing how tacit knowledge generated through micro-level human–AI collaboration is externalized as articulated experiential insights, validated and simplified into shared heuristics, and ultimately codified and embedded in organizational routines to help firms to renew internal knowledge r...
Erica Wen Chen, Hongkun Tang, Ben Nanfeng Luo et al.· Management Decision· 0 citations
This comprehensive review synthesises research on agentic and generative AI, human-AI cooperation, human-AI cooperation, algorithmic management, trust and explainability, decision-rights theory, and technology adoption into a conceptual multi-case framework comparing agentic AI adoption in sectors such as healthcare, f...
Dasaradha Arangi, Sreemanthula Jhansi, Minhaz Husain et al.· Journal of Progress in Artif...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in organizational workflows, and employees can access and experiment with AI tools through ‘Bring Your Own AI’ practices. Wider access raises a theoretical question about whether organizational support (OS) continues to guide technology acceptance once AI access is...
Malinee Aonviset, Veera Bhatiasevi, D. Sagarik· Global Business Review· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in organizational work,
but the availability of AI technology alone does not explain whether
organizations become more innovative. This study develops an empirical
framework that positions Human–AI Collaboration (HAIC) as an
organizationally relevant capability and...
Samson, T. J. Gnanapragash, K. Selvakumar et al.· European Journal of Prosthod...· 0 citations
A dual perception is revealed in which optimism regarding AI’s potential coexists with recognition of the organizational adjustments it demands, revealing a dual perception in which optimism regarding AI’s potential coexists with recognition of the organizational adjustments it demands.
M. Nakash, E. Bolisani· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.